Questions tagged [monodromy]

Monodromy is the study of how objects from mathematical analysis, algebraic topology, algebraic geometry and differential geometry behave as they "run round" a singularity.

Let $X$ be a connected and locally connected based topological space with base point $x$, and let $\displaystyle p:{\tilde {X}}\to X$ be a covering with fiber $\displaystyle F=p^{-1}(x)$. For a loop $γ: [0, 1] → X$ based at $x$, denote a lift under the covering map, starting at a point $\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}\in F$, by $\displaystyle {\tilde {\gamma }}$. Finally, we denote by $\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}\cdot {\tilde {\gamma }}$ the endpoint $\displaystyle {\tilde {\gamma }}(1)$, which is generally different from $\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}$. There are theorems which state that this construction gives a well-defined group action of the fundamental group $π_1(X, x)$ on $F$, and that the stabilizer of $\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}$ is exactly $\displaystyle p_{*}\left(\pi _{1}\left({\tilde {X}},{\tilde {x}}\right)\right)$, that is, an element $[γ]$ fixes a point in $F$ if and only if it is represented by the image of a loop in $\displaystyle {\tilde {X}}$ based at $\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}$. This action is called the monodromy action and the corresponding homomorphism $π_1(X, x) → \text{Aut}(H*(Fx))$ into the automorphism group on $F$ is the algebraic monodromy. The image of this homomorphism is the monodromy group. There is another map $π_1(X, x) → \text{Diff}(Fx)/\text{Is}(Fx)$ whose image is called the topological monodromy group.

32 questions
201
votes
14 answers

Why $\sqrt{-1 \cdot {-1}} \neq \sqrt{-1}^2$?

I know there must be something unmathematical in the following but I don't know where it is: \begin{align} \sqrt{-1} &= i \\\\\ \frac1{\sqrt{-1}} &= \frac1i \\\\ \frac{\sqrt1}{\sqrt{-1}} &= \frac1i \\\\ \sqrt{\frac1{-1}} &= \frac1i \\\\…
5
votes
3 answers

What is the difference between a group representation and an isomorphism to GL(n,R)?

The big picture is that I am trying to understand how the monodromy group of functions defined on $\mathbb{C} \setminus \{z_1, z_2, z_3,\ldots, z_n\}$ is related to the fundamental group (first homotopic group) of the set itself, i.e.…
Jack
  • 804
4
votes
1 answer

Voisin's proof of some properties of locally constant sheaves (Proposition 3.9)

I'm currently reading the second volume of Voisin's Hodge Theory book and I'm trying to understand some statements in the third chapter, dedicated to monodromy. In particular, there's the following lemma Lemma 3.6. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a local…
4
votes
0 answers

Self contained exposition of second order Fuchsian ODEs

I am teaching a graduate course in Complex Analysis. I would like students to give an oral presentation at the end of the term on a topic which we did not cover in the lecture. So I am putting together a list of textbook chapters and expository…
4
votes
1 answer

Laurent expansion of Meijer's G function

I am considering the following equation (a Generalized hyper-geometric equation): $$\left(D-\beta_1\right)\left(D-\beta_2\right)f(x)-x\left(D+1-\alpha_1\right)\left(D+1-\alpha_2\right)f(x)=0$$ where in this case I specifically take…
4
votes
0 answers

Understanding some concepts about Monodromy

I'm reading Simpson's paper "Higgs Bundles and Local Systems". There he defines for a local system $V$ of vector spaces on a compact Kahler manifold $M$ we have a representation of fundamental group $\pi_1(M,x) \to GL(V_x)$. Define the monodromy…
3
votes
1 answer

Are there two isomorphic transitive subgroups of $\mathfrak{S}_n$ that are not conjugate?

I know that we can find two subgroups of $\mathfrak{S}_6$ both isomorphic to $\mathfrak{S}_5$ that are however not conjugate (here) in $\mathfrak{S}_6$. These subgroups are not conjugate precisely because one and only one of them is transitive. Can…
3
votes
1 answer

Necessary & Sufficient condition for the existence of Analytic Continuation

While solving the problems on Analytic continuation from Gamelin's book; I encountered this one- still unsolved: Let $D= \{0 < |z| < \epsilon\}$ and suppose $f$ is holomorphic at $z_{0} \in D$ and $e^{w_{0}} = z_{0}$ . Show that $f$ has an analytic…
2
votes
0 answers

Does the monodromy action of a fiber bundle lie in the bundle's structure group?

Suppose we have a (topological) fiber bundle $p:E\to B$ with fiber $F$ and structure group $G$. Since $G$ acts on $F$ by homeomorphisms, it induces an action on the (integral) homology $H_*(F)$, i.e., there is a group homomorphism…
Steve
  • 207
2
votes
1 answer

monodromy representation associated with pushforward of constant sheaf

I am reading Geordie Williamson's guide to perverse sheaves and stuck on Example 5.11. Consider the map $f:\mathbb{C}^* \to \mathbb{C}^*: z \mapsto z^m$. Let $\underline{k}$ be the constant sheaf on $\mathbb{C}^*$ with values in $k:=\mathbb{C}$…
2
votes
0 answers

Local monodromy of Kummer Sheaves

Let $\mathbb{F}_q$ be a finite field, $\chi$ a complex (or $\overline{\mathbb{Q}_\ell}$) character of $\mathbb{F}_q^\times$, and $\mathcal{L}_\chi$ the Kummer sheaf on the multiplicative group $\mathbb{G}_m/\mathbb{F}_q$. The literature I could find…
1
vote
1 answer

Why the assumption of locally-connected, while defining a monodromy group?

The Wikipedia page on monodromy groups start with an assumption that the base space $X$ of the covering map $p: E \longrightarrow X $ is connected and locally-connected. However, I am unable to understand the reason for the assumption of…
1
vote
0 answers

Monodromy Theorem Proof via bisections (Ahlfors 1979)

If you are familiar with the proof of the Monodromy Theorem using bisections, I would appreciate a more detailed explanation of the final argument. Though I do my best to mention all relevant things below, the lead-up to the proof is kind of long,…
1
vote
1 answer

Monodromy groups of 2 algebraic functions

I'm following the book "Abel's Theorem in Problems and Solutions" by V.B. Alekseev, where the author introduces schemes of Riemann surfaces in such a way that an arrow indicates passage from one sheet of Riemann surface to another induced by…
1
vote
1 answer

Trouble with simplifying $e^{\pi i(\beta+\beta')}(e^{2\pi i(\alpha+\gamma)}-e^{-2\pi i \beta'})$

So I have the following computation $$ e^{\pi i(\beta+\beta')}(e^{2\pi i(\alpha+\gamma)}-e^{-2\pi i \beta'}), $$ everything is a constant. For a bit of context this is a computation appearing in finding the monodromy of the hipergeometric…
1
2 3