2

Use contour integration methods to compute $$ \int_\mathbb{R} {\cos\left(x\right) \over 1 + x^{2}}\,{\rm e}^{−{\rm i}xt}\,{\rm d}x\,, \qquad \forall\ t > 0 $$

Could someone suggest the proper contour to use ?. I can do the rest I'm sure, but I have no clue what contour to use. Thanks.

Felix Marin
  • 94,079

1 Answers1

4

Let's look at

$$I(a) = \int_\mathbb{R} \frac{e^{iax}}{1+x^2}\,dx$$

for $a\in \mathbb{R}$. If $a\geqslant 0$, then the exponential $e^{iaz}$ is bounded in the upper half-plane, so one can evaluate $I(a)$ by using a semicircular contour consisting of the interval $[-R,R]$ on the real axis and the semicircle $Re^{it},\, t\in [0,\pi]$ in the upper half-plane. The standard estimate shows that the integral over the semicircle tends to $0$ for $R\to \infty$, so the residue theorem yields

$$I(a) = 2\pi i\sum_{\operatorname{Im}\zeta > 0} \operatorname{Res}\left(\frac{e^{iaz}}{1+z^2}; \zeta\right) = 2\pi i \operatorname{Res}\left(\frac{e^{iaz}}{1+z^2}; i\right).$$

For $a < 0$, the exponential $e^{iaz}$ is not bounded in the upper half-plane, it grows exponentially for $\operatorname{Im} z \to +\infty$, so we cannot use the same contour in that case. But $e^{iaz}$ is bounded in the lower half-plane for $a < 0$, so we can use a semicircle in the lower half-plane, $Re^{-it},\, t\in [0,\pi]$ to close the contour. Again, the standard estimate shows that the integral over the semicircle tends to $0$ as $R\to\infty$, and - note the orientation of the contour - the residue theorem yields

$$I(a) = -2\pi i\sum_{\operatorname{Im}\zeta < 0} \operatorname{Res}\left(\frac{e^{iaz}}{1+z^2}; \zeta\right) = -2\pi i \operatorname{Res}\left(\frac{e^{iaz}}{1+z^2}; -i\right)$$

then.

Of course in this particular case, parity shows that $I(a) = I(-a) = I(\lvert a\rvert)$, so we can get by with only the contour in the (closed) upper half-plane here, but generally, no such short-cuts are available.

Then, to evaluate the integral

$$\int_\mathbb{R} \frac{\cos x}{1+x^2} e^{-itx}\,dx$$

one can use Eulers formula for the cosine to get it into the form $\frac{1}{2}(I(a_1) - I(a_2))$.

Daniel Fischer
  • 211,575