1

Assume we have a real-valued function $f=f_\epsilon(x)$ depending on a (typically small) parameter $\epsilon$, whose inverse (with respect to $x$) is well-defined but hard to compute. What can be said about $\frac{\partial}{\partial \epsilon}f^{-1}$ (without computing $f^{-1}$ explicitly)?

For the sake of concreteness, consider $$f_\epsilon(x):=x\sqrt{1+\epsilon^2(1+x+x^2)}.$$ Then $f'_\epsilon(x)>0$ for every $x\in\mathbb{R}$, and so $g_\epsilon:=f_\epsilon^{-1}$ is well defined as a function of $x$ on the whole real line $\mathbb{R}$. An exact expression for $f_\epsilon^{-1}$ would involve solving a quartic equation in $x$, which we don't want to do unless it turns out to be really necessary. My question is: how can we get some control on $\frac{\partial}{\partial \epsilon}g_\epsilon$? More precisely, it is straightforward to verify that $$\frac{\partial}{\partial \epsilon}f_\epsilon(x)=\frac{\epsilon x (1+x+x^2)}{\sqrt{1+\epsilon^2(1+x+x^2)}},$$ and so $\Big|\frac{\partial}{\partial \epsilon}f_\epsilon(x)\Big|\leq C_1(1+x+x^2)$ as long as $x$ lies in the bounded region $|x|\leq C_1\epsilon^{-1}$. These are the kind of (uniform in $\epsilon$) bounds I am interested in. Can one find similar (uniform in $\epsilon$) bounds for $\Big|\frac{\partial}{\partial \epsilon}g_\epsilon(y)\Big|$ which hold in a region $|y|\leq C_2\epsilon^{-1}$, say?

UPDATE: I was making the mistake of thinking that one could use the chain rule to evaluate

\begin{equation} \textrm{(1)}\quad\quad\quad \frac{\partial}{\partial\epsilon}(F_\epsilon\circ G_\epsilon)(x) \end{equation} (here $F_\epsilon$ and $G_\epsilon$ are just some functions of $x$ depending on $\epsilon$, not necessarily inverses of each other) as a product of two terms. That turns out not to be the case, but one should still be able to express (1) as a sum of two or more terms. Any ideas?

Thank you.

user17240
  • 389
  • You've tried performing implicit differentiation? – J. M. ain't a mathematician Oct 06 '11 at 23:43
  • @J.M.: Do you mean differentiating $g_\epsilon(f_\epsilon(x))=x$ with respect to $\epsilon$? If so, how would you handle the right hand side? – user17240 Oct 07 '11 at 00:47
  • Something like it. You have $x=g_\epsilon(x)\sqrt{1+\epsilon^2(1+g_\epsilon(x)+g_\epsilon(x)^2)}$... – J. M. ain't a mathematician Oct 07 '11 at 00:59
  • @J.M.: Well, differentiating your expression for $x$ with respect to $\epsilon$ will produce terms containing factors of the form $\frac{\partial}{\partial\epsilon}g_\epsilon$, which is exactly what we are trying to estimate. I cannot see how that will work... – user17240 Oct 07 '11 at 02:12
  • @J.M.: And besides, $x$ does not depend on $\epsilon$, so you should have $\frac{\partial}{\partial\epsilon}x=0$. See the update above. – user17240 Oct 07 '11 at 18:22
  • Hmm, yes. Indeed your problem looks a bit gnarly... – J. M. ain't a mathematician Oct 07 '11 at 18:36
  • Can you write down the inverse ($=:g_0(x)$) of the function $f_0(x)$, as in your example? If yes, you could write $f_\epsilon(x)=f_0(x)+\epsilon f_1(x)+O(\epsilon^2)$ and similarly $f_\epsilon^{-1}(x)=g_0(x)+\epsilon g_1(x)+O(\epsilon^2)$. Now determine $g_1(x)$ by equating coefficients with respect to $\epsilon$. Mathematica is a great help in such calculations. – Christian Blatter Oct 07 '11 at 19:12

0 Answers0