I have less than surface level knowledge on both evaluating convolution sums and using binomial coefficients (I think this is stuff learned or heavily studied in Discrete math which I myself never took), and even less on evaluating a combination of these 2 concepts. That said, I want to see all of the many moving parts involved in evaluating the following convolution series:
$$\tag{1} J_n = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2^{2n}}\sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^k \binom{2n}{k}\binom{4n-2k}{2n}(k-n)\frac{(n-k-\frac{1}{2})!}{(n-k+1)!}$$
In the procedure for evaluating the series, several steps unknown to me were performed (apparently including manipulating the binomial coefficients) to obtain:
$$\tag{2}J_n = -\frac{n}{2^{2n}}\sqrt{\pi}\binom{4n}{2n}\frac{(n-\frac{1}{2})!}{(n+1)!}S_n$$
where $S_n$ is defined by using the following recurrence relation: $$a_0 = 1\\a_{k+1} = -\frac{(n-k-1)(n-k+1)}{(2n-k-\frac{1}{2})(k+1)}a_k$$ to identify
$$a_k = \frac{(1-n)^{(k)} (-1-n)^{(k)}}{(\frac{1}{2}-2n)^{(k)} k!}$$ in $S_n = \sum_{k=0}^n a_k$, where I just learned rencently that the notation: $^{(k)}$, is referred to as a $\textit{rising factorial}$. My only real experience with creating recurrence relations was from creating power series solutions to ODEs and using boundary conditions to evaluate $c_k$ only for $k=0$ and $k=1$, I've never evaluated $c_k$ for any and all $k$ and I've never identified a recurrence relation outside of that context.
So, we finally end up having to evaluate $$\tag{3}S_n = \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{(1-n)^{(k)} (-1-n)^{(k)}}{(\frac{1}{2}-2n)^{(k)} k!} = _2F_1\Big(1-n,-1-n;\frac{1}{2}-2n;1\Big)$$
Where $_2F_1(a,b;c;z)$ is something called a $\textit{hypergeometric function}$, and I guess these have their own method of evaluation which I do not know about. By evaluation of the hypergeometric function, the series in (3) evaluates to $$S_n = \sqrt{\pi}\frac{(-\frac{1}{2}-2n)!}{(-\frac{3}{2}-n)!(\frac{1}{2}-n)!}$$
The properties I know of for Binomial coefficients (so far from the book $\textit{Concrete Mathematics}$ which I obtained yesterday) are the following:
- symmetry: $\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n}{n-k}$
- factoring: $\binom{n}{k} = \frac{n}{k}\binom{n-1}{k-1}$
- addition formula: $\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n-1}{k}+ \binom{n-1}{k-1}$
- polynomial argument: $(n-k)\binom{n}{k} = (n-k)\binom{n}{n-k} = n\frac{n-k}{n-k}\binom{n-1}{(n-1)-k} = n\frac{(n-1)!}{(n-1-k)!(n-1-(n-1-k))!}= n\binom{n-1}{k}$
- addition formula (falling factorial): $\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n-1}{k}+ \binom{n-1}{k-1} = \frac{(n-1)_k}{k!} + \frac{(n-1)_{k-1}}{(k-1)!} = \frac{(n-1)_k (n-k)}{k!}+\frac{(n-1)_{k-1}k}{k!}=\frac{(n-1)_{k-1}n }{k!}=\frac{(n)_k}{k!}$
- general summation formula (from addition formula): $\binom{n}{k} = \sum_{k\le n}^n \binom{n+k}{k} = \binom{n}{0}+\binom{n+1}{1}+...+\binom{n+n}{n} = \binom{n+n+1}{n} = (2n+1)\binom{2n}{n}$
where we note in the above formula that we've changed indices from $k$ to $n$.
- negatives: $\binom{-1}{k} = (-1)^k, \binom{-1}{-1-k} = (-1)^{-1-k}$
For factorials, I know all of the basic ones like $n! = n(n-1)!$, and some of the properties from the wikipedia on gamma functions:
- $\Gamma(1/2) = \sqrt{\pi}$
- $\Gamma(1/2+n) = \binom{n-1/2}{n}n!\sqrt{\pi}$
- $\Gamma (1/2-n) = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{\binom{-1/2}{n}n!}$
And that's about all I know for likely relevant properties. Surely other more advanced properties are applied throughout this problem starting with getting from (1) to (2), and I haven't even touched on deriving recurrence relations in the latter portions of this derivation.
So, I want to see 1) what happened to $\binom{2n}{k}\binom{4n-2k}{2n}$ and how we end up with $\binom{4n}{2n}$, 2) the process by which we derive to a recurrence relation (I'm unfamiliar with the procedure for obtaining one in this context, and I have barely a surface level knowledge of recurrence relations), 3) how we derived $a_k$ from the recurrence relation (I don't think I've ever done this in any of my formal education from calculus to ODEs, but if this is trivially easy for this problem, any link showing and explaining procedure for how the recurrence relation is used to obtain this would suffice), and 4) how to evaluate the hypergeometric function (I have no knowledge of hypergeometric functions).
That's quite a lot, but as I said at the beginning, there are a lot of moving parts involved in moving from (1) to (2) which involve more than my less than surface level knowledge in the relevant subjects that this derivation demands greater proficiency in.