Well, in honor of an old cartoon I'll say a miracle occurs. But can we get behind the curtain to see how the special effects are made?
If you take the square root of, let us say, $2358$ by the standard "long division" method, you get $48$ with a remainder of $54$, which may be interpreted as the equation
$2358=48^2+54.$
We can adapt this method to determining the square root of a polynomial, and for the one given in this problem we end with this:
$x^8-8x^7+8x^6+40x^5-14x^4-232x^3+488x^2-568x+1=(x^4-4x^3-4x^2+4x+1)^2+(-192x^3+480x^2-576x)$
If the remainder were a constant times a square then we would be able to render our octic polynomial in the form $a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)$ or perhaps $a^2+b^2=(a+bi)(a-bi)$, getting a pair of quartic factors which would then be solvable by radicals in the usual way. Sadly, we can't do that because the remainder is a cubic polynomial. Nonetheless, the fact that the coefficients of this remainder have a common factor makes one go "hmmm...". What if there were a way to modify the remainder so that it has an even degree and could be a square quantity (or next best, a constant times one)?
I started by noting that the square root of $2358$ as determined by the standard method comes out as $48$ with a remainder of $54$. But did I really have to render the "quotient" as $48$? If I allow a negative remainder in the final stage maybe I could render the root as $49$ instead, in which case the remainder is indeed negative and we get an expression equally valid as the first one I quoted:
$2358=48^2+54$ but also
$2358=49^2-43.$
We might even say that the second form is superior because, with the absolutely smaller remainder, it renders the rounded value of $\sqrt{2358}$ (correctly) as $49$ instead of $48$.
Now what can we do with our polynomial square root? Let us say that, just as we rendered the last digit of the root as $9$ instead of $8$ when we extracted the square root of $2358$, we leave the constant term in our quartic expression as something other than $1$. We get
$x^8-8x^7+8x^6+40x^5-14x^4-232x^3+488x^2-568x+1=(x^4-4x^3-4x^2+4x+h)^2+[(-2h+2)x^4+(8h-200)x^3+(8h+472)x^2+(-8h-568)x+(-h^2+1)]$
Can this remainder be a squared quantity, perhaps multiplied by a constant, for some value of $h$, presumably rational?
A necessary condition for this to occur in the quartic expression $ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e$ is $a/e=(b/d)^2$. Here we require
$\dfrac{-2h+2}{-h^2+1}=\left(\dfrac{8h-200}{-8h-568}\right)^2$
$\dfrac{2}{h+1}=\left(\dfrac{h-25}{h+71}\right)^2$
We turn this to a cubic polynomial equation for $h$, seek rational roots and discover $h=49$. We again go "hmmm...", for not only did we hit on a rational root but we incremented $h$ from its earlier value ($1$) by half the common factor of $96$ we saw in the earlier remainder.
We insert $h=49$ and obtain
$x^8-8x^7+8x^6+40x^5-14x^4-232x^3+488x^2-568x+1=(x^4-4x^3-4x^2+4x+49)^2-96[x^4-2x^3-9x^2+10x+25]$
If the bracketed quantity were to be a square, it would be $(x^2-x-5)^2$ to match the degree 4, degree 3, degree 1 and degree 0 terms (which our equation for $h$ was designed to do). But do we get the proper degree 2 term? In fact:
$(x^2-x-5)^2=x^4-2x^3-9x^2+10x+25$
and we have hit on our squared remainder!
So now we just factor the octic polynomial as a difference of squares whose roots contain $\sqrt{96}$ or equivalently $\sqrt{6}$:
$x^8-8x^7+8x^6+40x^5-14x^4-232x^3+488x^2-568x+1=[(x^4-4x^3-4x^2+4x+49)+4\sqrt6(x^2-x-5)][(x^4-4x^3-4x^2+4x+49)-4\sqrt6(x^2-x-5)]$
and we then solve each quartic factor by the usual method.
The roots, with all radicals defined as nonnegative real numbers, are
$1+\sqrt2+\sqrt3+\sqrt[4]{3}$
$1-\sqrt2+\sqrt3+\sqrt[4]{3}$
$1+\sqrt2+\sqrt3-\sqrt[4]{3}$
$1-\sqrt2+\sqrt3-\sqrt[4]{3}$
$1+\sqrt2-\sqrt3\pm i\sqrt[4]{3}$
$1-\sqrt2-\sqrt3\pm i\sqrt[4]{3}$
This set of roots conforms with the $C_2×D_4$ symmetry from the Galois group calculation.