Questions tagged [polynomials]

For both basic and advanced questions on polynomials in any number of variables, including, but not limited to solving for roots, factoring, and checking for irreducibility.

Usually, polynomials are introduced as expressions of the form $\sum_{i=0}^dc_ix^i$ such as $15x^3 - 14x^2 + 8$. Here, the numbers are called coefficients, the $x$'s are the variables or indeterminates of the polynomial, and $d$ is known as the degree of the polynomial. In general the coefficients may be taken from any ring $R$ and any finite number of variables is allowed. The set of all polynomials in $n$ variables $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ over a ring $R$ is denoted by $R[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$. Strictly speaking this is a formal sum, because the variables do not represent any value. Nevertheless, the variables of a polynomial obey the usual arithmetic laws in a ring (like commutativity and distributivity). This makes $R[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$ a ring itself. One should note that $R[X_1][X_2]=R[X_1,X_2]$. This idea can be extended to $R[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$ in a very natural way.

An expression of the form $rX_1^{i_1}X_2^{i_2}\cdots X_n^{i_n}$ ($r\in R$) is called a term (of the polynomial). Polynomials are defined to have only finitely many terms. An expression with infinitely many different terms is generally not considered to be a polynomial, but a (formal) power series in one or more variables.

When $P\in R[X]$, $P(x)$ is the evaluation of $P$ at $x$ (pronounced $P$ of $x$, or simply $Px$). Here $x$ does not necessarily have to be an element of $R$. For $P(x)$ to be properly defined for an $x$ in some ring $S$ we need:

  • a homomorphism $\phi:R\to S$
  • the image of all coefficients of $P$ under $\phi$ should commute with $x$.

Evaluation is now simply performed by replacing all coefficients $r_i$ of $P$ by $\phi(r_i)$ and all appearances of $X$ by $x$. This quite naturally gives an expression that is well defined as an element of $S$. The concept of evaluation is naturally extended to $R[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$.

27773 questions
306
votes
22 answers

Why can ALL quadratic equations be solved by the quadratic formula?

In algebra, all quadratic problems can be solved by using the quadratic formula. I read a couple of books, and they told me only HOW and WHEN to use this formula, but they don't tell me WHY I can use it. I have tried to figure it out by proving…
idonno
  • 4,033
197
votes
5 answers

A Topology such that the continuous functions are exactly the polynomials

I was wondering which fields $K$ can be equipped with a topology such that a function $f:K \to K$ is continuous if and only if it is a polynomial function $f(x)=a_nx^n+\cdots+a_0$. Obviously, the finite fields with the discrete topology have this…
Dominik
  • 14,660
173
votes
15 answers

General formula for solving quartic (degree $4$) equations

There is a general formula for solving quadratic equations, namely the Quadratic Formula, or the Sridharacharya Formula: $$x = \frac{ -b \pm \sqrt{ b^2 - 4ac } }{ 2a } $$ For cubic equations of the form $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$, there is a set of three…
John Gietzen
  • 3,621
171
votes
1 answer

Rational roots of polynomials

Can one construct a sequence $(a_k)_{k\geqslant 0}$ of rational numbers such that, for every positive integer $n$ the polynomial $a_nX^n+a_{n-1}X^{n-1}+\cdots +a_0$ has exactly $n$ distinct rational roots ? If we cannot construct it explicitly, can…
user84673
  • 2,057
170
votes
19 answers

What actually is a polynomial?

I can perform operations on polynomials. I can add, multiply, and find their roots. Despite this, I cannot define a polynomial. I wasn't in the advanced mathematics class in 8th grade, then in 9th grade I skipped the class and joined the more…
Travis
  • 3,604
154
votes
4 answers

Does $R[x] \cong S[x]$ imply $R \cong S$?

This is a very simple question but I believe it's nontrivial. I would like to know if the following is true: If $R$ and $S$ are rings and $R[x]$ and $S[x]$ are isomorphic as rings, then $R$ and $S$ are isomorphic. Thanks! If there isn't a proof…
145
votes
0 answers

If polynomials are almost surjective over a field, is the field algebraically closed?

Let $K$ be a field. Say that polynomials are almost surjective over $K$ if for any nonconstant polynomial $f(x)\in K[x]$, the image of the map $f:K\to K$ contains all but finitely many points of $K$. That is, for all but finitely many $a\in K$,…
Eric Wofsey
  • 342,377
139
votes
9 answers

Continuity of the roots of a polynomial in terms of its coefficients

It's commonly stated that the roots of a polynomial are a continuous function of the coefficients. How is this statement formalized? I would assume it's by restricting to polynomials of a fixed degree n (maybe monic? seems like that shouldn't…
Harry Altman
  • 4,993
139
votes
6 answers

Why are the solutions of polynomial equations so unconstrained over the quaternions?

An $n$th-degree polynomial has at most $n$ distinct zeroes in the complex numbers. But it may have an uncountable set of zeroes in the quaternions. For example, $x^2+1$ has two zeroes in $\mathbb C$, but in $\mathbb H$, ${\bf i}\cos x + {\bf…
MJD
  • 67,568
  • 43
  • 308
  • 617
130
votes
1 answer

Is There An Injective Cubic Polynomial $\mathbb Z^2 \rightarrow \mathbb Z$?

Earlier, I was curious about whether a polynomial mapping $\mathbb Z^2\rightarrow\mathbb Z$ could be injective, and if so, what the minimum degree of such a polynomial could be. I've managed to construct such a quartic and rule out the existence of…
Milo Brandt
  • 61,938
111
votes
10 answers

How do I prove that $x^p-x+a$ is irreducible in a field with $p$ elements when $a\neq 0$?

Let $p$ be a prime. How do I prove that $x^p-x+a$ is irreducible in a field with $p$ elements when $a\neq 0$? Right now I'm able to prove that it has no roots and that it is separable, but I have not a clue as to how to prove it is irreducible.…
107
votes
1 answer

All polynomials with no natural roots and integer coefficients such that $\phi(n)|\phi(P(n))$

Let $P(x)$ be a polynomial with integer coefficients such that the equation $P(x)=0$ has no positive integer solutions. Find all polynomials $P(x)$ such that for all positive integers $n$ we have $\phi(n) \mid \phi(P(n))$. It is conjectured there…
107
votes
13 answers

Why would I want to multiply two polynomials?

I'm hoping that this isn't such a basic question that it gets completely laughed off the site, but why would I want to multiply two polynomials together? I flipped through some algebra books and have googled around a bit, and whenever they…
106
votes
9 answers

Congruence Arithmetic Laws, e.g. in divisibility by $7$ test

I have seen other criteria for divisibility by $7$. Criterion described below present in the book Handbook of Mathematics for IN Bronshtein (p. $323$) is interesting, but could not prove it. Let $n = (a_ka_{k-1}\ldots a_2a_1a_0)_{10} =…
103
votes
6 answers

Is the notorious $n^2 + n + 41$ prime generator the last of its type?

The polynomial $n^2+n+41$ famously takes prime values for all $0\le n\lt 40$. I have read that this is closely related to the fact that 163 is a Heegner number, although I don't understand the argument, except that the discriminant of $n^2+n+41$ is…
MJD
  • 67,568
  • 43
  • 308
  • 617
1
2 3
99 100