I was inspired from this problem with an integral of an infinite tetration. I saw that you can do this series for the infinite tetration with an analytic continuation. However, the
Here is the sum with some terminology:
$$\mathrm{R=\sum_{x\in \Bbb Z} (-1)^x \left(x^\frac1x -1\right)= \sum_{0\ne x\in \Bbb Z} (-1)^x \left(x^\frac1x -1\right) +\lim_{x\to 0^+} (-1)^x \left(x^\frac1x -1\right)=-1+\sum_{0\ne x\in \Bbb Z} (-1)^xx^\frac1x -\sum_{0\ne x\in \Bbb Z} (-1)^x=.5645…-.3787…i }$$
This converges using the alternating series test from this graph or simply do interval testing to find an increasing function on [0,e] and decreasing on [e,$\infty$]. For the negative branch, the function decreases to zero for the real and imaginary parts as seen here. As said before, the function approaches zero from both sides and therefore, R exists by the alternating series test. Here are some partial sum graphs excluding x$\to$ 0=-1. The negative sum converges as seen here:
If we could evaluate the sum, then we could get a solution. This seems unlikely to get a closed solution without a sum, therefore, this will be an answer to some integral. This looks like it could be a sophomore dream like problem.
Of course we can easily do $$\mathrm{R=\int_0^R dx=\int \sum_{x\in \Bbb Z} \frac d{dx}(-1)^x \left(x^\frac1x -1\right)dx}$$ but it was hoped to find a definite integral which is not obvious like the one from 0 to R of y=1.
If the sum was taken over positive x, for x>2 as the summand value for x=1 is 0, then $$\mathrm{R_+= \sum_{x=2}^\infty (-1)^x \left(x^\frac1x -1\right)=-.187… }$$
I could also try to find a representation term by term, but that would be tedious. What is an integral representation or alternate non-sum representation of R or $\mathrm R_+$? Please give me feedback and correct me!
I did find this using the derivative like Feynman Integration:
$$\mathrm{R_+=\sum_{a=2}^\infty \int_0^a\frac{cos(\pi x)x^{\frac1a-1}}{a}+i\pi cos(\pi x)\left(x^\frac1a-1\right)dx}$$


sumalt(k=2,(-1)^k*(k^(1/k)-1))gives0.187859642462Something wrong? – Gottfried Helms Jun 16 '21 at 22:11