6

Could someone help me with this problem and explain the solution

Let $f(x)$ be a polynomial with integral coefficients. Suppose that $a$, $b$, $c$, and $d$ are distinct integers such that $$f(a)=f(b)=f(c)=f(d)=1991.$$ Show that $f(h)=1993$ cannot exist for any integer $h$.

Now in the solution it basically took a polynomial $$g(x)=f(x)-1991.$$ Hence $(x-a)$, $(x-b)$, $(x-c)$, $(x-d)$ are factors of $g(x)$. So it took $$g(x)=p(x)(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d),$$ where $p(x)$ has integral coefficients. It explained that, for $g(h)=2$, the values of $h-a$, $h-b$, $h-c$, $h-d$ have to be $-1$, $-2$, $1$, $2$, and so we get that $$g(h)=4p(h)=2.$$ This cannot be true.

This was the solution given, but I cannot understand why $p(h)$ cannot be $1/2$. Also, why does it have integral coefficients?

Could somebody explain?

Naruto
  • 133

3 Answers3

6

Since $g$ has integer coefficients, then also $p$ has integer coefficients, provided $a,b,c,d$ are integer.

If they are distinct, then $h-a$, $h-b$, $h-c$, $h-d$ are four distinct divisors of $2$, so their product is $4$.

Thus you get the impossible relation $4p(h)=2$.

It’s impossible because, for integer $h$, $p(h)$ is integer.

Note 1. I had to add the conditions that $a,b,c,d$ are distinct integers and that $h$ is integer. Otherwise the statement is false, in general.

Note 2. If a polynomial with integer coefficients $g(x)$ is divided by the polynomial $x-a$ ($a\in\mathbb{Z}$), then the quotient has integer coefficient as well: just think to the long division algorithm, or prove it by induction on the degree of $g(x)$. The fact is obvious if $g(x)$ is constant. Suppose it has degree $n>0$ and that the result is true for polynomials of degree $<n$. Then $g(x)=cx^{n}+h(x)$, where $h$ has degree $<n$. Then we can write $$ g(x)=cx^n-ca^n+h(x)+ca^n=(x-a)(cx^{n-1}+cax^{n-2}+\dots+ca^{n-1})+(x-a)h_1(x) $$ by the well known formula about $x^n-a^n$ and the induction hypothesis on $h(x)+ca^n$ which has degree $<n$ and so $h_1(x)$ has integer coefficients.

egreg
  • 244,946
1

Let $p(x)=q(x)+r(x)$, where $q(x)$ has integer coefficients and $r(x)$ contains the fractional parts. Then $$(x-a)(r_1x^k+r_2x^{k-1}+\ldots) \\ =r_1x^{k+1}+(r_2-ar_1)x^k+\ldots $$ so the leading coefficient of $(x-a)r(x)$ is the same as the leading coefficient of $r(x)$. So $(x-a)r(x)$, and then $(x-a)p(x)$, has a coefficient with a fraction. Repeat with $(x-b),(x-c)$ and $(x-d)$, to see that $f(x)$ must have a fractional coefficient. Since it doesn't, $r(x)$ contains no terms at all, so $p(x)$ has integer coefficients.

Empy2
  • 52,372
-1

Here's a simpler approach to the proof:

$\rightarrow$Similar to previous approaches, Let $g(x)=f(x)-1991$

Hence, we have: $g(x)=p(x)(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d)$, where, $p(x)$ is a polynomial with integer coefficients.

Now, assume for the sake of contradiction:

$\exists h \in \mathbb{Z}: f(h)=1993$ $\implies g(h)=f(h)-1991=2$

NOTE: $2$ is a prime number.

From our hypothesis: $$g(h)=p(h)(h-a)(h-b)(h-c)(h-d)=2......(A)$$ Where,$(h-a),(h-b),(h-c),(h-d)$ are all distinct integers [since, $h,a,b,c,d\in\mathbb{Z}$]

METHOD 1: Can the multiplication of $4$ distinct integers be $2$ ?

METHOD 2: For $(A)$ to hold true we need atleast two terms of:$(h-a),(h-b),(h-c),(h-d)$ to be exactly equal to $1$.

Lets say, $(h-a)=(h-b)=1\implies a=b$, which clearly violates the given property of uniqueness for $a,b,c,d$ ; Similar for other casses too.

$\rightarrow\leftarrow$ (CONTRADICTION)

Any corrections for ambiguities is openly accepted. Hope you like my approach to the problem :)

  • if anybody like it , then a little support is much appreciated......it would help me a lo since i am new to the MSE community – Ashmit Mukherjee Apr 23 '24 at 19:51
  • 4
    This answer basically provides the same information as the other answers (AFAICT) but also misses a couple of relevant steps in those answers and has a few inaccuracies as a result. For one, you don't make any case that $p(x)$ has integer coefficients, which is an important piece of the argument; for another, when you state 'Can the multiplication of 5 distinct integers be 2?' you forget that $p(h)$ doesn't have to be distinct from all of the $(h-a)$, etc; the statement is really 'can the multiplication of 4 distinct integers by an arbitrary integer be 2?' – Steven Stadnicki Apr 23 '24 at 20:13
  • Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please [edit] to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center. – Community Apr 23 '24 at 20:14
  • Also, your method 2 argument is incorrect, particularly the statement that 'we need at least three terms to be exactly equal to 1'; the fact that terms can also be negative here is relevant. For instance, if you replace 2 by 4 (that is, ask if 1995 is a valid value) then one can have e.g. $(x-a)=-2$, $(x-b)=-1$, $(x-c)=1$, $(x-d)=2$ and therefore have four distinct integers multiplying to 4. – Steven Stadnicki Apr 23 '24 at 20:15
  • Thanks a lot for correcting me, much appreciated, i will efit it right away – Ashmit Mukherjee Apr 23 '24 at 20:33
  • 3
    Welcome to stackexchange. It's good that you want to help. I think you should work on new questions (where the OP has shown some work of their own). Please don't answer old questions that have good answers already unless you have something really different to contribute. – Ethan Bolker Apr 23 '24 at 21:21
  • thanks for the advice,i will try my best – Ashmit Mukherjee Apr 24 '24 at 05:34