3

Reading up about Bunyakovsky conjecture, it mentions that in order to verify that polynomial $$f(x)=c_0+c_1x+\dots+c_nx^n$$ represents coprime values, or more generically in order to find $\gcd\{f(d), d \geq 1\}$, it is said to be equivalent to represent $f(x)$ in a form $$ f(x)=a_0+a_1\binom{x}{1}+\dots+a_n\binom{x}{n} $$ and find value $\gcd(a_0,a_1,\dots,a_n)=\gcd\{f(d), d \geq 1\}$ instead. Can someone reference the source of this claim, ideally a proof?

I could not find it anywhere on this site or elsewhere on the internet. All I've been able to do was to play with the coefficients and by observation find out that $$ a_i = i!\sum_{k=i}^{n}{k\brace i}c_k, $$ where ${k\brace i}$ are Stirling numbers of the second kind, although I didn't prove that either (it is probably provable by induction, but it wasn't my goal).

Bill Dubuque
  • 282,220
Sil
  • 17,976

2 Answers2

2

I think I've found it.

In A Survey on Fixed Divisors, page 3 mentions generalized version for multivaried polynomials (definition of $d(S,f)$ is mentioned on previous page, it is quite generic but in our case it is $\gcd$ of all polynomial values).

Thereom 2.1 (Hensel [67]) Let $f \in \mathbb{Z}[\underline{x}]$ be a polynomial with degree $m_i$ in $x_i$ for $i=1,2,\dots,n$. Then $d(\mathbb{Z}^n,f)$ is equal to the g.c.d of the values $f(r_1,r_2,\dots,r_n)$, where each $r_i$ ranges over $m_i+1$ consecutive integers.

And comments after clarifies that for $n=1$ we get desired result:

Thus, if $f(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is a polynomial of degree $k$ then $d(\mathbb{Z},f)=(f(0),f(1),\dots,f(k))$.

So in fact, we can use any consecutive $k+1$ integer values! And the actual proof is referenced to K. Hensel, Ueber den grössten gemeinsamen Theiler aller Zahlen, welche durch eine ganze Function von n Veränderlichen darstellbar sind, J. reine angew. Math. 116 (1896), 350–356. Too bad it is in german, I am not gonna get much of it.

However, the article talks about $(f(0),f(1),\dots,f(k))$, but wiki states $(a_0,a_1,\dots,a_n)$. But later in the same article there is a Theorem 5.5 which states several equalities, this is essentially one of them.

Sil
  • 17,976
2

Let me show that if $$f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^d\binom xia_i,$$ then $$\gcd(\{f(n):n\in\def\Z{\mathbb Z}\Z\})=\gcd(f(n_0),\dots,f(n_0+d))=\gcd(a_0,\dots,a_d)$$ for any $n_0\in\Z$.

On the one hand, it is clear that $\gcd(a_0,\dots,a_d)$ divides $f(n)$ for every $n\in\Z$, as each $\binom ni$ is an integer. I will prove the other direction $$\forall n_0\in\Z\colon\quad\gcd(f(n_0),\dots,f(n_0+d))\mid a_0,\dots,a_d$$ by induction on $d$. For $d=0$, $f(x)=a_0$, hence the result is clear.

Assume the statement holds for $d-1\ge0$; we will prove it for $d$. Putting $g=\gcd(f(n_0),\dots,f(n_0+d))$, the difference polynomial $$\Delta f(x)=f(x+1)-f(x)=\sum_{i<d}\binom xia_{i+1}$$ satisfies $$g\mid \Delta f(n_0),\dots,\Delta f(n_0+d-1),$$ hence by the induction hypothesis, $$g\mid a_1,\dots,a_d.$$ Thus, $g$ divides $$a_0=f(n_0)-\sum_{i=1}^d\binom{n_0}ia_i$$ as well.

  • More generally see this answer. $\ \ $ – Bill Dubuque May 13 '25 at 14:26
  • I’m sorry, but in what sense is that more general? As far as I can decipher it (the answer does not define either $f_n$ or $g$, and neither appears in the OP), you are just showing the special case $d=4$ of the statement here, minus the expression in terms of binomial coefficients. – Emil Jeřábek May 13 '25 at 14:50
  • Obviously that argument works quite generally. – Bill Dubuque May 13 '25 at 14:55
  • So? That still would not make it more general. And it still does not even mention the gcd of coefficients of the expression $\sum_i\binom xia_i$, which is the actual question here (the fact that the gcd of all integer values equals the gcd of any $d+1$ consecutive values is only an addendum that follows from the proof). – Emil Jeřábek May 13 '25 at 14:59