Using only the field axioms of real numbers prove that $(-1)(-1) = 1$
(1) I start with an obvious fact:$$0 = 0$$
(2) Add $(-1)$ to both sides of the equation:
$$0 + (-1) = 0+ (-1)$$
(3) Zero is the neutral element of addition
$$(-1) = (-1)$$
(4) One is the neutral element of multiplication
$$(-1)(1) = (-1)$$
$$(-1)(1+(-1)+1)=(-1)$$
(5) Multiplication is distributive under addition
$$(-1)(1)+(-1)(-1)+(-1)(1) = (-1)$$
(6) One is the neutral element of multiplication
$$(-1)+(-1)(-1)+(-1)=(-1)$$
(7) Add $1$ to both sides
$$(-1)+(-1)(-1)+(-1)+1=(-1)+1$$
(8) Negative one is the additive inverse of one
$$(-1)+(-1)(-1) +0 = 0$$
(9) Add 1 to both sides
$$1 + (-1) + (-1)(-1)+0 = 0 + 1$$
$$0 + (-1)(-1) + 0 = 0 + 1$$
(10) Zero is the neutral element of addition
$$(-1)(-1) = 1$$
Is my proof good? Should I change something?
- 3,759
3 Answers
Some people like to condense these things into one string of equalities:
$$\begin{align}(-1)(-1)=(-1)(-1)+0 &= (-1)(-1)+(-1)+1\\ &= (-1)(-1)+(-1)(1)+1\\ &=(-1)(-1+1) + 1\\ &=(-1)(0) + 1\\ &=0+1\\ &=1 \end{align}$$
This is basically just your argument, rearranged. It begins with $(-1)(-1)$ and ends with $1$, and we can justify each equal sign along the way: i) $0$ is the additive identity, ii)$-1$ and $1$ are opposites, iii) $1$ is the multiplicative identity, iv) distribution, v) $-1$ and $1$ are opposites, vi) $0$ is an annihilator for multiplication, vii) $0$ is the additive identity.
The only step here that isn't an axiom is that $0\cdot a=0$ for all $a$, but this is usually one of the first things you prove.
- 32,044
What do you think of this?
Lemma. In a field $a\cdot 0=0\cdot a=0$, for any $a\in\mathbb{F}$
proof
$a\cdot 0=a\cdot (1+(-1))=a+(-a)=0$
$0\cdot a=a\cdot 0=0$ for the commutativity of product
end proof
end lemma
main proof
$1=1\\ 1+0\cdot 0=1\\ 1+(1-1)(1-1)=1\\ 1+1\cdot 1+1(-1)-1(1)+(-1)(-1)\\ 1+1-1-1+(-1)(-1)=1\\ 0+0+(-1)(-1)=1\\ (-1)(-1)=1$
- 26,731
-
Ridiculous though it may sound, how do you know that $0 \cdot 0 = 0$? – Aemilius Nov 03 '17 at 19:47
-
-
@Aemilius should work now. Have a look. Disclaimer: I am not saying your proof is bad. I just wanted to show mine. – Raffaele Nov 03 '17 at 19:54
-
One needs to prove first $(-1)x=-x$. Since $-1+1=0=-1+(-(-1))$, this implies (as inverses are unique!) $1=-(-1)=(-1) (-1)$.
- 2,513
$x + z \le y+z$ This is true also when $x = y$ – Aemilius Nov 03 '17 at 19:39