11

It can be proved that there are two irrational numbers $a$ and $b$ such that $a^b$ is rational (see Can an irrational number raised to an irrational power be rational?) and that for each irrational number $c$ there exists another irrational number $d$ such that $c^d$ is rational (see For each irrational number b, does there exist an irrational number a such that a^b is rational?).

My question is: Is there an irrational number $a$ such that $a^a$ is rational (and how could you prove that)?

Bill Dubuque
  • 282,220
M_F
  • 345
  • 2
    $a^a=x$ has at least one real solution $a$ for each positive rational $x$, so all we need is to prove that there exists an $x$ such that $a$ must be irrational... (I suggest $x=2$ as a worthy candidate...) – abiessu Feb 05 '16 at 15:23

4 Answers4

24

By continuity of the function $x^x$, there is an $a$ such that

$$a^a=2.$$

This number is irrational. Otherwise, let $a$ be the irreducible fraction $p/q$ and

$$\left(\frac pq\right)^{p/q}=2,$$ is equivalent to $$p^p=2^qq^p,$$

which implies that $p$ is even and $q$ is even, a contradiction.


By the way, as

$$\ln(a^a)=a\ln(a)=\ln(a)e^{\ln(a)},$$

we have

$$\color{green}{a=e^{W(\ln(2))}}$$

where $W$ is the Lambert function.

7

Consider the unique (positive) solution $a$ to $x^x = 2$. If $a$ were rational, say, $a = \frac{p}{q}$, $p$ and $q$ are positive integers such that $\gcd(p, q) = 1$, we would have $$\left(\frac{p}{q}\right)^{p / q} = 2 ,$$ and rearranging gives $$p^p = q^p 2^q .$$ Since there is no integer $n$ such that $n^n = 2$, we must have $q > 1$ and hence $2 \mid p^p$. Because $2$ is prime, we have $2 \mid p$. So, $2$ occurs an even number of times the prime factorization of $p^p$ and likewise of $q^p$. Since $p^p = q^p 2^q$, we must have $2 \mid q$, but now $2 \mid p, q$, and this contradicts $\gcd(p, q) = 1$. Thus, $a$ is irrational but $a^a$ is rational (in fact, an integer).

Travis Willse
  • 108,056
6

If $a^a=2$, then $a$ is irrational: If $a=p/q$, then $(p/q)^p=2^q$ is an integer, so $p/q$ is an integer.

Andrew Dudzik
  • 31,007
-4

The Gelfond-Schneider theorem applies to tell us that $a$ must be transcendental. You will not find a solution for $a$ by using integers, square roots, and such operations that lead to algebraic numbers. Hilbert's seventh problem is related to this problem.

  • Of course this has already been posted many times before, e.g. here and here, etc via the Linked questions. Please don't duplicate prior answers. – Bill Dubuque Nov 17 '24 at 05:37
  • Why should I not duplicate prior answers? Furthermore, it's not a duplicate, the content of my post is different compared to your references. Feel free to point out what part of the answering section of the help center mentions your concept of duplication. – TheAlertGerbil Nov 17 '24 at 05:58
  • The content of your answer is already in the linked answers (and many more). See e.g. here for site-specific policy on such. – Bill Dubuque Nov 17 '24 at 06:54
  • I disagree, the content of my answer is not already in the linked answers. They never mentioned Hilbert's seventh problem. Your link says "If you find the answers to the duplicate target to be lacking, please feel free to add a new answer to the older question, rather than answering the newer duplicate.". It's not the advice you gave me. Feel free to edit it. – TheAlertGerbil Nov 17 '24 at 06:58
  • Both of the prior answers I linked - like you - link to the Wikipedia page on the G-S theorem - which already mentions Hilbert's 7th problem (which is tangential here). If you really think that deserves explicit emphasis then you should have added a comment to one of those prior answers instead of duplicating them (it is very easy to find them by search - which you are expected to do - cf. linked site policy in my prior comment). $\ \ $ – Bill Dubuque Nov 17 '24 at 07:05
  • I'm not expected to do anything. – TheAlertGerbil Nov 17 '24 at 07:32