I have to work on the following piece of code:
function Vector(x, y) {
this.x = x || 0;
this.y = y || 0;
}
Vector.add = function(a, b) {
return new Vector(a.x + b.x, a.y + b.y);
};
Vector.sub = function(a, b) {
return new Vector(a.x - b.x, a.y - b.y);
};
Vector.scale = function(v, s) {
return v.clone().scale(s);
};
Vector.random = function() {
return new Vector(
Math.random() * 2 - 1,
Math.random() * 2 - 1
);
};
Vector.prototype = {
set: function(x, y) {
if (typeof x === 'object') {
y = x.y;
x = x.x;
}
this.x = x || 0;
this.y = y || 0;
return this;
},
add: function(v) {
this.x += v.x;
this.y += v.y;
return this;
},
sub: function(v) {
this.x -= v.x;
this.y -= v.y;
return this;
},
scale: function(s) {
this.x *= s;
this.y *= s;
return this;
},
length: function() {
return Math.sqrt(this.x * this.x + this.y * this.y);
},
lengthSq: function() {
return this.x * this.x + this.y * this.y;
},
normalize: function() {
var m = Math.sqrt(this.x * this.x + this.y * this.y);
if (m) {
this.x /= m;
this.y /= m;
}
return this;
},
angle: function() {
return Math.atan2(this.y, this.x);
},
angleTo: function(v) {
var dx = v.x - this.x,
dy = v.y - this.y;
return Math.atan2(dy, dx);
},
distanceTo: function(v) {
var dx = v.x - this.x,
dy = v.y - this.y;
return Math.sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy);
},
distanceToSq: function(v) {
var dx = v.x - this.x,
dy = v.y - this.y;
return dx * dx + dy * dy;
},
lerp: function(v, t) {
this.x += (v.x - this.x) * t;
this.y += (v.y - this.y) * t;
return this;
},
clone: function() {
return new Vector(this.x, this.y);
},
toString: function() {
return '(x:' + this.x + ', y:' + this.y + ')';
}
};
This piece of code has a function Vector and to this function there is a property attached which is Vector.add. However, a few lines down there is Vector.prototype which then in turn defines add.
So at this point we have Vector with Vector.add and Vector.prototype.add and I am not quite sure what is the difference when calling these.
For full reference the code I am trying to redo is from the Gravity Points CodePen so you can view the whole code as well as its usage.
However, to me, as someone who has mainly used ECMAScript 6, this code is looking very strange, to say the least.