6

If we have such topological space $(X,\mathcal{T})$ that it is compact and Hausdorff, then we can say that for any other topology $\mathcal{H}$ on $X$ such that $\mathcal{T}\subseteq\mathcal{H}$, the topology $\mathcal{H}$ is Hausdorff but no compact.

Hint: Let $(X,\mathcal{T})$, $(Y,\mathcal{H})$ be such two topological spaces that $X$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff. If $f:X\to Y$ is a continuous bijective map, then $f$ is a homeomorphism.

I have tried the following but I don't understand the problem:

Suppose that there exists such topological space $\mathcal{H}$ that $\mathcal{T}\subseteq\mathcal{H}$ and $(X,\mathcal{H})$ is compact, then there exist such countable set $C$ that $\overline{C}=X$.

SHB
  • 317

1 Answers1

7

Let $ (X, \mathcal {T}) $ a compact Hausdorff space and $\mathcal{H} $ a strictly finer topology $\mathcal{T} $, if we take the identity function $ i$ such that $ i :(X,\mathcal {H}) \to (X, \mathcal {T}) $, this function is continuous because $ \mathcal{T} \varsubsetneq \mathcal {H} $.     Since $ \mathcal {H} $ is strictly finer than $ \mathcal {T} $ can take $ C $ closed in $ \mathcal{H} $ is not in $ \mathcal {T} $. If $ (X, \mathcal {H}) $ was compact would have a compact in $ \mathcal {H} $, now as $C=i(C) $ is $ C $ would have a compact $ \mathcal{T} $ then $ \mathcal {T} = \mathcal {H} $ which can not be.

am I right?

user153805
  • 71
  • 2