In many situations in topology, (like the poincare duality) they put a distinction between the space being a manifold or just a cell or simplicial complex. I want to know why this is important, in other words are there manifolds without the latter structure?
Asked
Active
Viewed 547 times
1
-
2Every manifold is homotopy equivalent to a cell complex, but not necessarily homeomorphic to one. Is it what you wanted to know? – Moishe Kohan May 02 '14 at 02:32
-
I need to know an example of a manifold(smooth or topological) which is not homeomorphic to a cell complex. – 7779052 May 04 '14 at 16:07
-
1There are no smooth examples. 4-manifold called E8 is a topological example. – Moishe Kohan May 04 '14 at 21:19
1 Answers
3
A homeomorphism from a manifold to a simplicial complex is called a triangularization. The $E_8$ manifold (a four-dimensional manifold) does not have a triangularization. I don't know the history of this result but I suspect it's from the late 80s as the proof uses Casson's invariant.
More recently -- just over a year ago! -- Ciprian Manolescu proved that there are manifolds of any dimension greater than 4 which do not admit an triangularization. He uses Pin(2)-equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology. Here is the paper.
Adam Saltz
- 2,626
-
3Smooth manifolds are triangularizable, though. The question does not make it too clear whether it is using manifold to mean smooth or topological manifolds. – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez May 02 '14 at 03:24
-
1The proof does not use Casson's invariant, the first proof of non-smoothability used Donaldson's invariants (1983); one can now prove it easier using Seiberg-Witten invariants. Of course, existence of E8 manifolds requires Freedman's work (1982). – Moishe Kohan May 02 '14 at 16:28
-
-
1Is it not possible to make a topological manifold smooth? so that a triangulization for a smooth manifold gives one for a topological manifold? – 7779052 May 04 '14 at 16:21
-
@7779052: Not every topological manifold is smoothable. See http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/408221 for a detailed discussion. – Moishe Kohan May 04 '14 at 23:37