1

Suppose $a$ is a real number and we know that $$0 \le a \le \varepsilon$$ for every $\varepsilon \gt 0$. I need to show that $a=0$. The book I am working out of already has shown by contradiction that $0 \le a \lt \varepsilon$ for every $\varepsilon \gt 0$ implies that $a=0$. I can honestly say I am confused, since if $a=\varepsilon$ and $\varepsilon \gt 0$, then $a\neq{0}$

Faffi-doo
  • 436

1 Answers1

2

If $\forall\varepsilon,0\le a \le \varepsilon$ then either $a>0$ or $a=0$. If $a>0$, then setting $\varepsilon<a$ we have $0\le a\le\varepsilon<a$ a contradiction. Then $a=0$.

Jose Antonio
  • 7,394
  • This is so confusing...aren't we told that $a\le \varepsilon$? How can then you say $\varepsilon \lt a$? – Faffi-doo Feb 17 '14 at 22:21
  • Because it holds for all $\varepsilon>0$. If you say that $a>0$, then I can choose a $0<\varepsilon<a$ and reached a contradiction is like a game. – Jose Antonio Feb 17 '14 at 22:23
  • So basically, as long as you can always find a number between $0$ and $a$, you have a contradiction to $a \gt 0$? – Faffi-doo Feb 17 '14 at 22:25
  • 1
    $a\in \mathbb{R}$, then either $a<0,a=0,a>0$ by the trichotomy. Clearly $a<0$ is not possible. Then either $a=0$ or $a>0$, but the latter yields a contradiction, because we can always pick some $0<\varepsilon<a$ because by hypothesis it holds for all numbers $>0$. Then what is the only alternative. – Jose Antonio Feb 17 '14 at 22:28
  • Okay...i see i think. It's the contradiction. Your inequality in your answer makes sense now. That seems to me not easy to figure out (i'm a novice at this style of proof...) – Faffi-doo Feb 17 '14 at 22:32
  • 1
    It's similar in nature to the "game" a number bigger than all the numbers. If you say that is $N$ then I say $N+1$. – Jose Antonio Feb 17 '14 at 22:34