Problem
Suppose $f^{(t)}(z)=a_0^{(t)}+\dotsb+a_{n-1}^{(t)}z^{n-1}+z^n\in\mathbb C[z]$ for all $t\in\mathbb R$, where $a_0^{(t)},\dotsc,a_{n-1}^{(t)}\colon\mathbb R\to\mathbb C$ are continuous on $t$. Is it true that there is always a complex-valued continuous function $\phi^{(t)}\colon\mathbb R\to\mathbb C$ such that $f^{(t)}(\phi^{(t)})=0\;(\forall t\in\mathbb R)$?
Topologically,
Let $S=\big\{\,(a_0,\dotsc,a_{n-1},z)\in\mathbb C^{n+1}\,\big\vert\,a_0+a_1z+\dotsb+a_{n-1}z^{n-1}+z^n=0\,\big\}$ and $\pi\colon S\to\mathbb C^n,(a_0,\dotsc,a_{n-1},z)\mapsto(a_0,\dotsc,a_{n-1})$. Is it true that $\pi$ has path lifting property (i.e. for each continuous map $p\colon[0,1]\to\mathbb C^n$, there exists a continuous map $\tilde p\colon[0,1]\to S$ such that $p=\pi\circ\tilde p$? (Sorry, I cannot find a good reference for that term. In my definition, there's no assumption of uniqueness.)
Or algebraically,
Let $R=\mathcal C(\mathbb R,\mathbb C)$ denote the ring of complexed-valued real continuous functions. Is it true that any monic polynomial over $R$ has a root in $R$?
Discussion
It's certainly true that there is a function $\phi_{t_0}^{(t)}$ continuous at $t=t_0$ such that $f(\phi_{t_0}^{(t)})=0\;(\forall t\in\mathbb R)$, no matter whether $t$ is a real or complex parameter, or a parameter from some Hausdorff space. It follows directly from, say, Rouché's theorem. For an elementary proof, see Michael Artin's Algebra, proposition 5.2.1(b). A sharper proposition of the original problem, i.e. replacing the real parameter $t\in\mathbb R$ with a complex parameter $w\in\mathbb C$, is generally demonstrably false, i.e. there could be no continuous function to be a root of the polynomial. Here's a simple counterexample: $f^{(w)}(z)=z^2-w$. Note that there's a branch point at $w=0$, and if we draw an arbitrary circle around the origin in the $w$-plane, we'll see that a root shouldn't be continuous on the whole $w$-plane $\mathbb C$, for otherwise letting $w$ travel the circle would lead to a contradiction.
It seems true when $t$ is a real parameter, since the dimension is lower. I have no idea how to attack this. I expect your grateful ideas or hints. Thanks!
Postscript
There's an old post related, inequivalent but informative and interesting.