1

I am looking at an exercise,where given that $a_{n}=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2+...+\sqrt{2}}}$,I have to show that $\lim_{n \to \infty}a_{n}=2$. We find that $a_{0}=0,a_{1}=\sqrt{2},a_{2}=\sqrt{2+a_{1}} \text{ and so on and we conclude that }a_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+a_{n}}$.Then we take the function $\varphi(x)=\sqrt{2+x}$,in order to apply the Banach fixed-point theorem.But which interval do we have to take?At the solution I have,the interval $[a,b]=[0,3]$ is taken,but I really haven't understood why?Could you explain it to me?

evinda
  • 8,037

3 Answers3

1

The interval is taken because it works; there isn't really a deeper reason. One of the nice things about real analysis -- especially when you take limits -- is that it doesn't matter too much what you choose for bounds on things. You usually have a great deal of freedom to make simple choices, or choices that simplify other things.

The argument you want to use only has three requirements:

  • It's a closed interval
  • Your sequence has a point in the interval
  • The function is a contraction mapping on the interval

It's almost hard to find an interval you couldn't use to make this argument work -- especially since you already know that the fixed point you're looking for should be $2$.

  • I understand..So,I could also take the interval [0,2],right?? – evinda Jan 14 '14 at 13:25
  • 1
    @evinda: Yep. I confess I would probably choose an upper bound larger than 2, though, just so I don't have to look up the fine print to see if being on the boundary matters. –  Jan 14 '14 at 13:27
  • I understand..Could you also explain me how you found that $a_{n}<2$ ?Did you suppose it and checked it or did you find it in an other way? – evinda Jan 14 '14 at 13:33
  • 1
    @evinda: I actually didn't use that at all, nor does the proof via fixed point theorem that you suggest. It's easy to prove if you already proven the limit to be $2$ since the sequence is increasing -- and if you haven't proven that yet, induction works as the other answers suggest. –  Jan 14 '14 at 13:40
  • Nice..thank you very much!!! – evinda Jan 14 '14 at 18:34
0

(1) Show inductively that $a_n$ is increasing.

(2) Show inductively that $a_n<2$.

Then, (1)+(2) imply that $a_n$ is convergent. Say $a_n\to x$. But then $a_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+a_n}\to x$. At the same time $\sqrt{2+a_n}\to\sqrt{2+x}$. Hence $x=\sqrt{2+x}$, thus $x^2-x-2=0$. This implies that $x=2$ or $x=-1$. But $x=-1$ is impossible, as $a_n>0$. Thus $a_n\to 2$.

0

$a_1=\sqrt{2}$, $a_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+a_n}, n=1,2,\cdots$

If we take the sequense $b_1=2$ and $b_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+b_n}, n =1,2, \cdots$

we can see that for every $n$ $a_n \le b_n=2$. Therefore, the sequence $a_n$ is bounded from above. On the other hand $a_1=\sqrt{2} \le a_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}$ and by induction we can see that the sequence $a_n$ is increasing. Therefore ite is convergent. If we denote the limit by $a$ and pass to the limit in $a_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+a_n}$ we have that $a=\sqrt{a+2}$. The solution of this equation is 2.

The inequalities above show that $a_n \in (0,3)$ for all $n$.

kmitov
  • 4,809