3

Let $S$ be a $\mathbb{Z}$-graded ring and $F$ a $\mathbb{Z}$-graded module that is free of finite rank $n$. Then we can write $F = \oplus_{i=1}^n S(\nu_i)$, where $S(\nu_i)$ is a graded ring isomorphic to $S$ given by $S(\nu_i)_k = S_{k+\nu_i}$.

Question 1: the ring isomorphism $S(\nu_i) \rightarrow S$ given by $x \mapsto x$ is not graded, right? This is because the element $1$ has degree $-\nu_i$ in $S(\nu_i)$, yet it is mapped to an element of degree $0$. Is my argument correct?

Now let $\phi: F \rightarrow G$ be a morphism of graded, free, finite-rank $S$-modules. This induces a morphism of the duals $\operatorname{Hom}(G,S) \rightarrow \operatorname{Hom}(F,S)$.

Question 2: How exactly is the grading of the dual module $\operatorname{Hom}(G,S)$ defined? From what i have seen in Eisenbud, it seems that the degrees all change sign upon dualization, but i don't understand if indeed this is the case and if so, why is it that way.

Manos
  • 26,949
  • Yes, it's correct. 2. Hom is not graded, in general. Instead one can consider the graded Hom (which is a submodule of Hom), made of graded homomorphisms of every degree.
  • –  Dec 10 '13 at 22:58
  • Jim's answer is great, but if you like you can also take a look here.
  • –  Dec 11 '13 at 00:03