14

Question: Suppose $M$ is a smooth manifold with boundary, $N$ is a smooth manifold, and $F:M\rightarrow N$ is a smooth map. Let $S=F^{-1}(c)$, where $c\in N$ is a regular value of both $F$ and $F\left|_{\partial M}\right. $. Prove that $S$ is a smooth submanifold with boundary in $M$, with $\partial S=S\cap \partial M$.

Work:

OK so let $n=\dim(N)$ and $m=\dim(M)$ and let $c$ be a regular value of both $F$ and $F\left|_{\partial M}\right.$. Then there are charts $(U,\phi)$ and $(V,\psi)$ centered at $c$ and $F(c)$ such that $c\in U$ and $F(U)\subset V$. Note that $(U,\phi)$ is a boundary chart for $M$.

We have that the function $\widetilde{F}=\psi\circ F\circ\phi^{-1} $ is smooth so there is an open neighborhood $U'$ of $\phi(c)$ such that there is an smooth extension of $G$ of $\widetilde{F}$ on $U'$.

Notice that we have that $G^{-1}(c)\cap H^{m}=\widetilde{F}^{-1}(c)\cap U'$. Now this is where I'm stuck, not sure where to go from here any tips?

3 Answers3

11

Following the proof given in Milnor's Topology From A Differentiable Viewpoint:

$\require{AMScd}$ $\begin{CD} x \in U \subseteq M @>F>> c \in V \subseteq N \\ @V\phi VV @VV\psi V \\ \phi\left(U\right) \subseteq H^{m} @>>\psi F \phi^{-1}> \psi\left(c\right) \in \psi\left(V\right) \end{CD}$

Because $c \in N$ is a regular value of $F$, for every $x \in F^{-1}\left(c\right) \subseteq M$, there are charts $\left(U,\phi\right)$ at $x$ in $M$ and $\left(V,\psi\right)$ at $c$ in $N$ such that $\psi F \phi^{-1}: \phi\left(U\right) \subseteq H^{m} \to \psi\left(V\right) \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n}$ is smooth, and has a regular value at $\psi\left(c\right)$.

$\begin{CD} \phi\left(U\right) \subset W \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{m} @>G>> \psi\left(c\right) \in \mathbb{R}^{n} \end{CD}$

Let $W$ be an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^{m}$ such that $W \cap H^{m} = \phi\left(U\right)$; and let $G:W\to\mathbb{R}^{n}$ be the smooth extension of $\psi F \phi^{-1}$ over $W$. Now, we can always choose $W$ small enough so that $G^{-1}\left(\psi\left(c\right)\right)$ does not contain any critical points (Sard's lemma; $\mathbb{R}^{m}$ is regular). Thus, $\psi\left(c\right)$ is a regular value of $G$; and by preimage theorem (for smooth manifolds), $Z := G^{-1}\left(\psi\left(c\right)\right)$ is a (m-n)-dimensional submanifold of $\mathbb{R}^{m}$.

Furthermore, since $G$ is constant over $Z$, $T_{a}Z \subseteq ker\left\{DG\left(a\right)\right\}$ for every $a \in Z$. But $DG\left(a\right):\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}$ is surjective, and the rank-nullity theorem implies $dim \left(ker\left\{DG\left(a\right)\right\}\right) =$ (m-n). Thus, $T_{a}Z = ker\left\{DG\left(a\right)\right\}$.

Now, define $\pi: Z \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{m} \to \mathbb{R}$ as $\left(x_{1},\ldots,x_{m}\right) \mapsto x_{m}$.


To show that $0 \in \mathbb{R}$ is a regular value of $\pi$:

Suppose otherwise. That is, suppose $\exists$ $a \in Z \cap \partial H^{m}$ such that $d\pi_{a}:T_{a}Z \to \mathbb{R}$ is not surjective. Then, $ker \left\{d\pi_{a}\right\}$ $=$ $T_{a}Z$ $=$ $ker \left\{DG(a)\right\}$. But, we know that $ker \left\{d\pi_{a}\right\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{m-1} \times \left\{0\right\} = \partial H^{m}$. Thus, $ker \left\{DG(a)\right\} \subseteq \partial H^{m}$ if $0$ is not a regular value for $\pi$.

Now, since $c \in N$ is a regular value of $F|_{\partial M}$ as well, arguing as before, we can show that $\bar{G} := G|_{W\cap\partial H^{m}}$ has a regular value at $\psi\left(c\right)$. That is, for every $a \in Z\cap\partial H^{m}$, $D\bar{G}\left(a\right): \mathbb{R}^{m-1} \to \mathbb{R}^{n}$ is surjective; and by rank-nullity theorem, $dim \left(ker\left\{D\bar{G}\left(a\right)\right\}\right) = $ (m-n-1)

Finally, $ker \left\{DG(a)\right\} \subseteq \partial H^{m}$ implies $ker \left\{DG(a)\right\} = ker \left\{D\bar{G}(a)\right\}$, which is clearly false (dimension mismatch). Hence, $0$ must be a regular value for $\pi$.


Since $0 \in \mathbb{R}$ is a regular value for $\pi$, $\left\{z \in Z | \pi\left(z\right) \geq 0\right\}$ $=$ $\phi\left(U \cap F^{-1}\left(c\right)\right)$ is a manifold with boundary $\left\{z \in Z | \pi\left(z\right) = 0\right\}$ $=$ $\phi\left(U \cap F^{-1}\left(c\right) \cap \partial M \right)$.

$\phi$ being a diffeomorphism, $U \cap F^{-1}\left(c\right)$ is a manifold with boundary $U \cap F^{-1}\left(c\right) \cap \partial M$. Observing that this is true for every $x \in F^{-}\left(c\right)$ completes the proof.

udit.m
  • 694
  • 1
    Why should $ker \left{DG(a)\right} = ker \left{D\bar{G}(a)\right}$ be the same? – serge Apr 13 '16 at 19:07
  • 1
    Since $\bar{G}$ is just the restriction of $G$ to $\mathbb{R}^{m−1} \times {0}$, the directional derivative of $\bar{G}$ along any direction in this $(m-1)$-dimensional subspace will be equal to the directional derivative of $G$ along the same direction. Now, the kernel of $DG\left(a\right)$ is contained in $\mathbb{R}^{m-1} \times {0}$ - what that means is that all the directions along which the derivative of $G$ is zero belong to $\mathbb{R}^{m-1} \times {0}$. Hope this helps! (removed my earlier comment which I'd typed on the phone, and had minor syntax mistakes) – udit.m Apr 14 '16 at 04:10
  • This shows that every $p \in F^{-1}(c)$ has a neighborhood $U$ in $M$ such that $U \cap F^{-1}(c)$ is a smooth manifold with boundary. Could you clarify why does this imply that $F^{-1}(c)$ is a smooth manifold with boundary? In other words, how do we show that the smooth charts coming from different $U \cap F^{-1}(c)$, $U' \cap F^{-1}(c)$ are smoothly compatible? – Tob Ernack Sep 01 '23 at 12:45
  • @TobErnack this is because of the local slice criterion for embedded sub manifolds with boundary, Theorem 5.51 on page 122 of Lee’s Smooth Manifolds. an outline can be found on page 101, Theorem 5.8 for the manifold without boundary case. – C Squared Oct 18 '23 at 07:01
0

Let $ p \in \partial M^m \cap F^{-1}(c)$ and let $ (U, \phi=(x^1, \dots, x^m\geq 0)) $ be a boundary chart about $ p $ and $ \psi $ be a chart about $ c \in N^n $, so $ F $ is locally given by $ \psi\circ F \circ \phi^{-1}: \mathbb{H}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n$ with $ (x^1, \dots, x^m) \mapsto (F^1(\overrightarrow{x}), \dots, F^n(\overrightarrow{x})) $. Let $ G: U' \subset \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n $ be an extension of $ \psi \circ F \circ \phi^{-1} $ to an open neighborhood $ U' $ of the origin (that's how we defined smoothness over $ \mathbb{H}^m $). Suppose $ U'' \subset U' $ is the open set of points where $ dG $ is surjective, which by definition also includes $ F^{-1}(c) \cap U' $. From this on everywhere that I write $ F $ it will make sense because of the existence of the submersion $ G\big|_{U''} $.

In this setting, $ (x^1,\dots, x^{m-1}) $ is a coordinate system for $ \partial M $ and the fact that $ p $ is a regular point of $ \partial M $ means $n \leq m-1$ and that among the coordinate vectors $ \{ \partial/\partial x^1, \dots, \partial / \partial x^{m-1} \} $, there are $ n $-many whose image under $ dF $ spans $ T_c N $, say $ \partial /\partial x^1, \dots, \partial / \partial x^n $; therefore $$ \theta: (x^1, \dots, x^n,x^{n+1}, \dots, x^m) \mapsto (F^1, \dots, F^n, x^{n+1}, \dots, x^m) $$ is a coordinate change (by considering its Jacobian) and $$ \psi \circ F \circ \phi^{-1} \circ \theta^{-1} : (F^1, \dots, F^n, x^{n+1}, \dots, x^m) \mapsto (F^1, \dots, F^n) $$ is a projection onto the first $ n $ coordinates. The nice point about the transition $\theta$ is that it keeps the $ x^m $ coordinate, so $ \mathbb{H}^m $ is invariant and it takes our boundary chart to another boundary chart. The portion of $ F^{-1}(c)$ lying in this chart is given by $ \{ (0, \dots, 0, x^{n+1}, \dots, x^m) | x^m \geq 0 \} $ which is an $ (m-n) $-dimensional slice and its boundary is exactly given by the points that are also inside $ \partial M $. For the points $ p $ in the interior of $ M $ we apply the usual regular level set theorem to get full charts so we don't see boundary points there.

0

If $p\in S\cap\text{Int}(M)$, then we can find a neighborhood $U$ of $p$ in $M$ such that $U\cap S$ is embedded in $U$ using the usual proof of the Regular Level Set Theorem. If $p\in S\cap\partial M$, then the idea is to use the following version of the rank theorem for manifolds with boundary (Problem $4$-$3$ in Lee's Introduction to Smooth Manifolds) to obtain such a neighborhood:

Let $M$ be a smooth manifold with boundary and $N$ be a smooth manifold without boundary. Let $F:M\rightarrow N$ be a smooth map with constant rank, and let $p\in\partial M$ such that $\text{ker}\:\text{d}F_{p}\not\subseteq T_{p}\partial M$. Then $F$ has a local coordinate representation of the form $$\widehat{F}(x^{1}, \dots, x^{r}, x^{r+1}, \dots, x^{m}) = (x^{1}, \dots, x^{r}, 0, \dots, 0)$$ in a neighborhood of $p$.

(For a proof, look here.)

Let $W$ be a neighborhood of $p$ such that $F|_{W}$ is a submersion. Since $\text{d}F_{p}$ and $\text{d}(F|_{\partial M})_{p}$ are surjective, we have $\text{dim}(\text{ker}\:\text{d}F_{p}) = m-n$ and $\text{dim}(\text{ker}\:\text{d}(F|_{\partial M})_{p}) = m-n-1$, which implies that $$\text{ker}\:\text{d}(F|_{W})_{p}\not\subseteq T_{p}\partial W.$$ Applying the above theorem, we obtain a neighborhood $U$ of $p$ contained in $W$ such that $U\cap S$ is embedded in $U$ as required.