Update: Probably, I haven't provided enough details to make my previous question clear. I will add more details to motivate my question now, and I don't think it can be considered a duplicate anymore because it is now self-contained.
Definition 1. Let $R$ be a commutative ring with a multiplicative identity. An element $a \in R$ is called a prime element if:
- $a$ is not an invertible element.
- If $b \mid a$, then $b$ is either an invertible element or is associated with $a$.
Suppose $F$ is a field and $F[x]$ is a polynomial ring. Then, authors define the notion of the degree of a polynomial. In particular, the degree of the zero polynomial is $-\infty$, and the degree of a constant nonzero polynomial is $0$.
Then, authors claim that prime elements in $F[x]$ play an important role, and those elements are called irreducible polynomials.
They provide an equivalent definition of an irreducible polynomial as the following: $f \in F[x]$ is called irreducible in $F[x]$ if:
- $\deg(f) > 0$,
- if $f = gh$, then either $g$ or $h$ is a constant polynomial.
If we stick to Definition 1 of a prime element, then I was not able to show that the definitions of irreducible polynomials are equivalent.
However, if we slightly modify the definition of a prime element, then in that case they are equivalent.
Definition 2. Let $R$ be a commutative ring with a multiplicative identity. An element $a \in R$ is called a prime element if:
- $a$ is a nonzero element,
- $a$ is not an invertible element,
- if $b \mid a$, then $b$ is either an invertible element or is associated with $a$.
Proof (using Definition 2).
$\boxed{\Rightarrow}$ Suppose $f$ is a prime element of $F[x]$. Then, by Definition 2, $f \neq 0$.
Since $f$ is not a unit, $f \notin F^* := F \setminus \{0\}$. Thus, $\deg(f) > 0$.
Suppose $f = gh$. Then $g \mid f$. If $g$ is a unit, then $g$ is a constant polynomial. If $g$ is associated with $f$, then $g = af$, where $a \in F^*$. Hence, $f = afh$, which implies $f(1 - ah) = 0$. Since $f \neq 0$, it follows that $1 = ah$, and thus $h$ is a unit, implying $h$ is a constant polynomial.
$\boxed{\Leftarrow}$ Suppose that $f \in F[x]$ is an irreducible polynomial.
Since $\deg(f) > 0$, $f$ is non-constant and hence $f$ is not invertible.
If $g \mid f$, then $f = gh$. If $g$ is constant (notice that $g \neq 0$ as $f \neq 0$), then $g$ is a unit.
If $h$ is constant (notice that $h \neq 0$), then $h$ is a unit, and hence $f$ and $g$ are associated.
Is my reasoning correct?
solution-verificationquestion to be on topic you must specify precisely which step in the proof you question, and why so. This site is not meant to be used as a proof checking machine You can't avoid duplication using such attempted solution-verification, see the SV tag definition and site rules: EoQS. $\ \ $ – Bill Dubuque Jan 19 '25 at 19:04