2

There are a lot of discussions on the matrix transpose already, but none of them seem to give a satisfying (visual) intuition. I guess I have collected the most, if not even all, ways to view and understand the transpose of a matrix.

My knowledge so far behind the transpose of a matrix

Algebraic perspective

Switching rows & columns

Connection to dual vectors & spaces

The rows of a matrix $A$ act on (contravariant) vectors, while the columns of a matrix act on covariant vectors / dual vectors / linear functionals. The transpose represents the linear transformation of the dual space to preserve the relation between contravariant and covariant vectors.

Here I personally like the answer of Manu in What is the geometric interpretation of the transpose? since it gives a illustrative simple example.

Switching the column- & row space of a linear transformation

If $A \in \mathbb R^{m \times n}$ is a linear transformation mapping from the row space / domain to the column space / image of the linear transformation, then is the transpose $A^T \in \mathbb R^{n \times m}$ does the opposite.

Preserving the dot product

Applying a matrix $A$ to a vector is the same as applying its transpose $A^T$ to the other vector in the dot product like $\langle A \underline x, \underline y \rangle = \langle \underline x, A^T \underline y \rangle$ as already answered by Berci in What's the intuition of the transpose of a matrix? [duplicate].

Singular value decomposition (SVD)

Every matrix can be described by three actions described by $A = U \Lambda V^T$ and $A^T = V \Lambda^T U^T$ where $\Lambda$ simply scales the vector and $U$ & $V$ are rotations. This was also described well by Chris Taylor in What is the geometric interpretation of the transpose?

Product of a matrix with its transpose

The product $A^T A$ and $A A^T$ are always square and symmetric. This is also linked to the Singular value decompostion.

Questions

    1. What does happen to $\underline x$ geometrically in $A^T \underline x$?
    1. What does it look like to map the image / column space $Col(A)$ back to the domain / row space $Row(A)$?
    1. How does this transformation $A^T \underline x$ compare geometrically to $A^{-1}x$?
    1. Why does $A^T$ simply mirror the basis vectors along $y=x$ in the 1st & 3rd quadrant, while in the 2nd & 4th quadrant it seems to get stretched in the opposite direction of $A$ along $y=-x$? See images below

Regarding the images - from top to bottom they use these matrices:

$A_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ $A_2 = \begin{bmatrix} -1 & -1 \\ 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}$ $A_3 = \begin{bmatrix} -0.5 & 1 \\ -1 & 0.5 \end{bmatrix}$ $A_4 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -0.5 \\ 0.5 & -1 \end{bmatrix}$ $A_5 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$

Additionally there are the basis vectors $\underline b_x$ & $\underline b_y$ of the $A$ matrix and the basis vectors of the transpose $\underline b_{tx}$ & $\underline b_{ty}$ of the $A^T$ matrix. The green dots are the fixed blue dots transformed by $A$, while the yellow dots are the fixed blue dots transformed by $A^T$.

Image 1 Image 2 Image 3 Image 4 Image 5

J. W. Tanner
  • 63,683
  • 4
  • 43
  • 88
lmixa
  • 65
  • 1
    It would be worth asking of there is a meaning to the transpose of a linear transformation $T:V\to V$ without picking a basis for the vector space $V.$ I think there isn't, but I may be wrong. So, a linear transformation's transpose is on a vector space $V$ with specific basis. I think. – Thomas Andrews Jan 07 '25 at 17:53
  • 1
    You might get a nice geometric perspective if you visualize dual vectors as hyperplanes: the row-vector $\underline{v}^T$ can be visualized as the plane ${\underline{v}^T \underline{x} = 1: \underline x \in \Bbb R^n}$ – Ben Grossmann Jan 07 '25 at 17:56
  • @ThomasAndrews Isn't the transpose of $T$ just defined as the linear map ${}^tT: V^{\vee} \to V^{\vee}$ sending a linear form $f$ to $f\circ T$? This does not require a basis at all. The trick though is that you need to shift from $V$ to its dual $V^{\vee}$. If somehow you want to identify $V$ with its dual, then you need to choose a basis. – Suzet Jan 08 '25 at 04:23
  • The more I visit this site, the less I understand what “geometric” means. – user1551 Jan 08 '25 at 10:54
  • Before geometric meaning perhaps there is a meaning more general still.

    Let me rephrase Qiaochu Yuan's answer, that we could see a "physical" meaning of "time-reversal": as $T$ sends elements of $V$ to $W$, with our "measuring instruments" in the dual space $W^*$ we can apply them using $T^t$ to the "past", source elements of $V$. The map transpose by definition is precisely this pull-back.

    (Notation from the @ThomasAndrews and other comments)

    – rych Jan 08 '25 at 11:36
  • @BenGrossmann: I do get this visualization but it is not entirely clear to me how you relate to the transpose with this. Could you explain this to me please? – lmixa Jan 08 '25 at 18:29
  • @rych I have now read this "pull-back"-property multiple times, I am not sure how to visualize this though. Do you have any idea here? – lmixa Jan 08 '25 at 18:30
  • @Imixa The idea would be to indicate what $A^T$ does by drawing hyperplanes before and after applying $A^T$. In other words, draw the hyperplane corresponding to $v^T$, then the hyperplane corresponding to $v^TA = (A^Tv)^T$. – Ben Grossmann Jan 08 '25 at 18:32
  • @Imixa Imagine going back in time and being able to measure things that used to be with today instruments – rych Jan 09 '25 at 06:04
  • Or, pull-back the "future" "instruments" to measure your current elements with – rych Jan 09 '25 at 08:53

0 Answers0