In high school calculus, the focus is on computations and not proofs. Proofs are introduced (if at all) for the sake of understanding rather than rigour.
As this answer mentions, proofs at this level make certain assumptions. For example, this answer on proving the limit of $e$ assumes $$\frac{d}{dx} \text{ln}x=\frac{1}{x}$$
And yet a search for proofs of the natural logarithm leads to those which assume knowledge of the limit.
The formulas I have seen in this context are:
- Derivatives and Integrals of $e^x$ and $\text{ln } x$
- Maclaurin/Taylor Series for $e^x$ and $\text{ln } x$
- Limits involving $e$. (Expressions of the form $(1+\frac{1}{x})^x$ whose limit is e as $x\rightarrow\infty$ and their extensions/variations
What is the correct order of proof of these different results that avoids circular reasoning?