The Levy -Kintchine formula is a great conquest of probability of the thirties. For understanding it, better is to assume that $\Pi$ is concentrated on $ (0,\infty)$ (thus using rather Laplace transform, a bit easier to manipulate) and to consider 3 cases:
A) Type zero: $\Pi$ is a bounded measure of mass $\lambda$: you probably know that then we get a so called compound Poisson, namely the law of $$Y=X_1+\cdots+X_N$$ where $X_i\sim \Pi/\lambda$ and $N$ is Poisson of mean $\lambda$ with $N, X_1,\ldots, X_n,\ldots $independent. $$E(e^{-sY})=\exp(\int_0^{\infty}(e^{-sx}-1)\Pi(dx).$$
B) Type one: $\Pi$ is unbounded but $$\int_0^{\infty}\min (1,x)\Pi(dx)<\infty.$$
Then $E(e^{-sY})=\exp(\int_0^{\infty}(e^{-sx}-1)\Pi(dx).$ still holds. To understand $Y$, consider the bounded $\Pi_n,$ which is the restriction of $\Pi$ to $(1/n,\infty)$ and the corresponding $Y_n.$ Type 1 implies that $Y_n\rightarrow Y$ in law - just compute. Note that $Y\geq 0.$
C) Type two, the most difficult to understand. We have $\int_0^{\infty}\min (1,x)\Pi(dx)=\infty$ but $$\int_0^{\infty}\min (1,x^2)\Pi(dx)<\infty.$$ Unfortunately $\int_0^{\infty}(e^{-sx}-1)\Pi(dx)$ diverges and we have to add a compensatory term like $\tau(x)=\sin x$ or $x/(1+x^2)$ or else (depending of the authors) such that
$$\int_0^{\infty}(e^{-sx}-1-s\tau(x))\Pi(dx)$$ converges. With this choice $E(e^{-sY})$ does exist but behold! $Y$ is not positive. To see this, use again our good $Y_n$, which is not positive anymore because of $\tau$ (again, just compute). We have again $Y_n\rightarrow Y$ in law.