This question is linked to Unicity of decomposition for the monoid generated by roots of the unity.
We set for $n \in \mathbb{N}^*$ $M_n$ the monoid generated by $n$-th roots of the unity and $M_n^\times$ the monoid generated by primitive $n$-th roots of the unity. They are respectfully $$M_n = \left\{ \sum_{\lambda \in U_n} k_\lambda \lambda, \, k_\lambda \in \mathbb{N} \right\}\\ M_n^\times = \left\{ \sum_{\lambda \in U_n^\times} k_\lambda \lambda, \, k_\lambda \in \mathbb{N} \right\}$$ Where $U_n$ is the set of $n$-th roots of the unity and $U_n^\times$ the set of primitive $n$-th roots of the unity.
My question is what is the minimal number of generators for these monoïds?
I already know that for $n = p_1 \cdots p_m$ where the $p_i$ are distinct primes and $m$ is even, we can remove $1$ from the list of the generators in the non-primitive case since $$\sum_{\lambda \in U_n^\times} \lambda = \mu(n) = 1$$ with $\mu$ the Möbius function.
And for $M_n$ where $n$ has at least two distinct primes in its decomposition, we need to remove $1$ as well.
The cases $n=1,2,3,4$ are easy to prove by reasoning geometrically:
- for $n=1$ it is direct since $M_1 = M_1^\times = \mathbb{N}$.
- for $n=2$ it is direct since $M_2 = \mathbb{Z}$ and $M_2^\times = -\mathbb{N}$
- for $n= 3$, if we keep only two generators we only have points contained in a half-plane which is absurd so three is the minimum for $M_3$, and since $M_3^\times = \mathbb{N}j + \mathbb{N} j^2$ is not contained in a line, we need these two generators.
- for $n = 4$ which is our first square example, we can easily see that we need all four of them.
Indeed $M_4 = \mathbb Z [i]$ which elements are uniquely determined by their real and imaginary parts, so as an abelian group it needs two non-zero generators which are $1$ and $i$ (or their opposite). And since it only has a monoid structure we need their opposites.
Now $M_4^\times = \mathbb{Z}i$ which obviously needs its two generators $i$ and $-i$.
My thoughts on this:
- It must be true for prime $n$.
- It might be true when $n$ is a product of two primes and we remove $1$.
- I have no clue if $n-1$ is the right number for $M_n$ when $n$ is a product of an even number of distinct primes.
- It is more complicated when some $a^2 \mid n$
Useful Information
For $n \leq 6$ and $n \neq 5$ $Z[e^{\frac{2i\pi}{n}}]$ is euclidian. It could be used to deal with these cases.