The divisor topology appears as Counterexample 57 in [Steen-Seebach]. It is a topological space $X := \{x \in \mathbb{N} : x \ge 2\}$ with the topology generated by open sets $U_n := \{x \in X : x\ \mathrm{divides}\ n\}$, $n \in X$. Is the divisor topology contractible?
A topological space is ultraconnected if it has no disjoint nonempty closed sets. The closure of a singleton $\{x\} \subset X$ is equal to the set of multiples of $x$ ([Steen-Seebach, 57.2]), so it follows that $X$ is ultraconnected. Hence if the divisor topology is not contractible, then it will provide a counterexample to 'ultraconnected $\Rightarrow$ contractible', which is why I am thinking about this. It is known that an ultraconnected space is path-connected, which is a necessary condition for contractible. A stronger condition than ultraconnected is the existence of a point $p \in X$ such that the only neighborhood of $p$ is $X$; this is equivalent to $p$ being an element of every nonempty closed set. It is known that this stronger condition does imply that $X$ is contractible. However, the previous remark about closures of singletons shows that $X$ does not satisfy this stronger condition.
Here are some other remarks I thought might be worth sharing, just because they helped me understand the space a bit better.
- Every neighborhood of a point $x \in X$ contains $U_x$ as a subset, so it follows that $X$ is an Alexandrov space (arbitrary intersections of open sets are open).
- ([Steen-Seebach, 57.1]) $X$ is $T_0$ (topological distinguishability) but not $T_1$ (points are closed), since $x < y$ implies $y \notin U_x$, but every neighborhood of $6$ contains $3$.
- ([Steen-Seebach, 57.4]) The set of primes is dense in $X$, and each singleton containing a prime is open.
Steen, Lynn Arthur; Seebach, J. Arthur jun., Counterexamples in topology. 2nd ed, New York - Heidelberg - Berlin: Springer-Verlag. XI, 244 p. (1978). ZBL0386.54001.