1

Problem

$∆ABC$ is a triangle with angle $C = 2 ∠B$. $D$ is a point on the side $BC$ such that $DC = 2 BD$. $E$ is a point on the line $AD$ such that $D$ is the midpoint of $AE$. Show that $∠ECB + 180° = 2 ∠EBC$.

Attempt

In my attempt to solve the problem, I began by labeling the angles of $∆ABC$, where $\angle ABC = \theta$ and $\angle ACB = 2\theta$, given that $\angle C = 2\angle B$ . Using the fact that $D$ divides $BC$ in a $2:1$ ratio and is the midpoint of $AE$ , I aimed at analysing the relationships between the angles involving points $E$, $D$, and $C$.

I explored the external angle relationships and aimed to prove the equation

$\angle ECB + 180^\circ = 2 \angle EBC$,

but the full details of the angle-chasing approach and geometric reasoning still need refining to complete the proof, can anyone please help me in completing the proof I am unable to connect the dots together.

Reza Rajaei
  • 6,236

3 Answers3

2

Here's a trigonometric but less convoluted approach:

Let $F$ be a point on $BC$ such that $2CF = BF$, and extend $CB$ to $F'$ such that $BF' = BD = DF = FC$. Note that both $AF'EC$ and $ABEF$ are parallelograms. Hence $\angle ECB = \angle AF'B := \alpha$, and $\angle EBC = \angle AFB := \beta$. Also, let $\angle C = 2\angle B = 2\theta$.

enter image description here

By $m:n$ theorem in triangles $AF'F$ and $\triangle ABC$, we have $$2\cot \alpha - cot \beta = 3\cot \theta$$and$$3\cot \beta = 2\cot2\theta - \cot \theta = \frac{-1}{\cot\theta}$$

Substituting the second into the first, we have $$2\cot \alpha - \cot \beta = -\frac1{\cot \beta}$$ Thus, we have $$ \cot\alpha = \cot2\beta$$ Since we can't have $\alpha = 2\beta$ (as $\beta$ is obtuse), $\alpha = 2\beta - 180^\circ$ as desired.

Reza Rajaei
  • 6,236
D S
  • 5,642
  • Nice solution! [+1]. I edited my diagram and added it to your post so that everyone can follow your solution more easily. BTW, it would be great if you could include what $m:n$ theorem is. – Reza Rajaei Nov 02 '24 at 21:09
  • mn theorem is not quite well known, however, I will add some references later – D S Nov 03 '24 at 12:18
1

To exclude this problem from the "unanswered" list, I am going to post my solution, which is not nice at all.

We place the diagram below on the coordinate system such that $B$ is the origin and $A$ lies on the $x-$axis, and WLOG, we assume $|BC|=3$. Considering $\angle B= \theta$, we will have $\angle A= 180^{\circ}-3\theta.$ By a little bit of trigonometric computation, we have: enter image description here

$$B=(0,0), \\ C=(3\cos \theta, 3\sin \theta), \\ D=(\cos \theta, \sin \theta), \\A=(3\cos \theta-\frac{3\sin \theta}{\tan 3\theta},0).$$

Hence,

$$E=(\frac{3\sin \theta}{\tan 3\theta}-\cos\theta, 2\sin\theta).$$

Using the formula for the angle between two lines with their slopes being known (Look at this.), we have:

$$\tan(\angle ECB)=|\frac{\tan\theta - \frac{\sin \theta}{4\cos \theta-\frac{3\sin \theta}{\tan 3\theta}}}{1+\tan \theta \frac{\sin \theta}{4\cos \theta-\frac{3\sin \theta}{\tan 3\theta}}}|=|\frac{3\sin\theta}{5\cos2\theta+4}|.$$

And, similarly:

$$\tan(\angle CBE)=|\frac{\tan\theta - \frac{2\sin \theta}{\frac{3\sin \theta}{\tan 3\theta}-\cos\theta}}{1+\tan \theta \frac{2\sin \theta}{\frac{3\sin \theta}{\tan 3\theta}-\cos\theta}}|=|3\cot\theta|.$$

Based on the diagram, we may assume $\angle ECB$ is acute and $\angle CBE$ is obtuse. Since $\theta \leq 60^{\circ}$, we must have:

$$\tan(\angle ECB)=\frac{3\sin\theta}{5\cos2\theta+4}, \\ \tan(\angle CBE)=-3\cot\theta.$$

Now, note that:

$$\tan (2\angle CBE)=\frac{2\tan(\angle CBE)}{1-(\tan (\angle CBE))^2}=\frac{-6\cot\theta}{1-9\cot^2 \theta}=\frac{3\sin\theta}{5\cos2\theta+4}= \tan (\angle ECB), $$

which implies either $2\angle CBE=\angle ECB$ or $2\angle CBE=\angle ECB+180^{\circ}.$

We are done.


Note: I did all the trig simplifications by using "Wolfram Alpha" although I believe they all can be done by hand.

Reza Rajaei
  • 6,236
0

I am trying to isolate a geometric, synthetic version of the stated property in the following Lemma. It turns out that the point $A$ has a secondary meaning, and can be eliminated, all the information about $A$ is also covered by $E$. The Lemma constructs instead of the triangle $\Delta ABC$ its reflection w.r.t. $D$, which is a triangle $\Delta EPQ$ with the same properties, the angle in $P$ is half the angle in $Q$. We denote by $x$ this angle. The stated property is then a corollary of the Lemma, and it is explained in natural manner using geometric constructions. Many properties of the involved points are listed and proved. I tried hard to obtain a purely synthetic proof of the Lemma, but complications occur on the path. So there will be also a trigonometry piece, involving the theorem of sines, cosines (Pythagoras generalized), and straightforward trigonometric calculus.


Lemma: Consider on the line the five points $Q,B,D,P,C$ in this order, so that the segments between two consecutive points have same length $QB=BD=DP=PC$.

  • $(a)$ Let $Y$ be the common mid point of the segments $BD$, $QP$, and denote by $\pi_Y$ thir common perpendicular bisector. Let $X$ be a point on $\pi_Y$. Denote by $x$ the (measure of the) equal angles $x=\widehat{XPQ}=\widehat{XQP}$.

  • $(b)$ Let $E$ be the point on the ray $[PX$ so that the angle in $Q$ in $\Delta EPQ$ is $2x$. Let $A$ be the reflection of $E$ w.r.t. $D$. So both triangles $\Delta EPQ$, $\Delta ABC$ have the angles in order $180^\circ-3x$, $x$, $2x$.

  • $(c)$ Let $M$ be the mid point of the segments $BC$ and $DP$, and let $\pi_M$ be their common perpendicular bisector. Let $S$ be the intersection of $\pi_M$ with $XP$.

  • $(d)$ On $\pi_B$, the perpendicular in $B$ on the line $QBDPC$, consider $T$ on the same side as $X,S$ so that $BT=2MS$. Then $T$ is the incenter of $\Delta ECQ$, and $ET,CST,QT$ are the angle bisectors of this triangle.

    mathematics stackexchange problem 4987577 :: geometric statement

  • $(e)$ Let $L\in QE$, $N\in CE$ be the other two tangent points of the incircle $\odot (T)$ on the corresponding sides. (The third one is $B$.) Let $K$ be on $\pi_B$, on the ray $[BT$, with $BK=2BT$. Then $K$ is also on this incircle, and also on the line $EXSP$. Let $J$ be on $[CA$ so that $\Delta SCJ$ is isosceles in $S$ (with two angles of $2x$ in $C,J$). Then $SJ=SC=SN=ST=SB$, i.e. $J,C,N,T,B$ are on the same circle centered in $S$, and $L,T,J$ are collinear. Also: the triangles are similar: $\Delta TBE\sim\Delta SCE$. Let $G,H$ be in the segment $QC$ be so that $QE=QG=HC$. (The points $G,H$ are reflected in each other w.r.t. $D$.) Then $N,X,H$ are collinear. The lines $QX$, $EG$, $BN$ are concurrent in a point of the circle $\odot(TLEN)$.

  • $(f)$ Then finally the following angles have the same measure, denote it by $y$: $$ y =\widehat{EBT} =\widehat{TBN} =\widehat{BCT} =\widehat{TCN} \ . $$ This implies the wanted relation: $$ 2\widehat{EBC} =2\left(\widehat{EBT} +\widehat{TBC}\right) = 2(y+90^\circ) =2y+180^\circ = \widehat{BCE} +180^\circ\ . $$


Proof of the Lemma: In $(a)$, $(b)$, $(c)$ there is nothing to be shown, these items are dealing with construction of points.

We show the property in $(d)$ of $T$, claimed to be the incenter of $\Delta ECQ$. The angles of $\Delta EPQ$ are $180^\circ-3x$, $x$, $2x$, so by the theorem of sines, after rescaling, we may and do take them to be $PQ=6\sin(180^\circ-3x)=6\sin 3x$, $EP=6\sin 2x$, $EQ=6\sin x$, so that each segment among $QB,BD,DP,PC$ is $2\sin 3x$, and $PM=\sin 3x$. We compute the area $[ECQ]$ of triangle $\Delta ECQ$, then its (half-)perimeter, then its inradius $r$ as the quotient. It is convenient to use $s=\sin x$ below, and force polynomial expressions in $s$ when possible. When not, we may also use $c=\cos x$. $$ \begin{aligned}{} [ECQ] &=\frac 12 QE\cdot QC\cdot \sin \hat Q = \frac 12 6\sin x\; 8\sin3x\; \sin 2x \\ &= 24\; \sin x\; \sin 2x\; \sin 3x=48s^3c(3-4s^2) \ . \\[3mm] CE^2 &= PE^2+PC^2-2\;PE\cdot PC\cdot\cos \hat P\\ &=36\sin^2 2x+4\sin^2 3x + 2\cdot 6\sin 2x\cdot 2\sin 3x\; \cos x\\ &=144\sin^2x\cos^2x + 4\sin^2x(3-4\sin^2 x)^2 + 48\sin^2x\cos^2x(3-4\sin^2x)\\ &=144s^2(1-s^2) + 4s^2(3-4s^2)^2 + 48s^2(1-s^2)(3-4s^2)\\ &=4s^2(9-8s^2)^2\ ,\\ CE &= 2s(9-8s^2)=2\sin x(9-8\sin^2x)\ , \\[3mm] \operatorname{Perimeter}(ECQ) &=CQ+EQ+EC\\ &=8\sin 3x + 6\sin x + 2\sin x(9-8\sin^2x)\\ &=8s(3-4s^2) + 6s +2s(9-8s^2)=48s(1-s^2)=48sc^2 \\[3mm] r&=\frac{48s^3c(3-4s^2)}{24sc^2}=2\cdot\frac sc\cdot s(3-4s^2) =2\tan x\cdot\sin 3x \\ &=2\tan x\cdot MP=2MS=BT\ . \end{aligned} $$ So $T$ is the point on the angle bisector in $Q$ of $\Delta ECQ$, and its distance to $CQ$ is exactly $r$, the inradius. So $T$ is the incenter of this triangle. We note that $C,S,T$ are collinear because of $BT:MS=2:1=BC:MC$.

We come to $(e)$.

Since $KB\perp CQ$, and the incenter $T$ is the mid point of $KB$, this segment is a diameter. We have $BK: MS=4:1=BP:MP$, so $K,S,P$ are colinear. We compare $\Delta TBC$, $\Delta TNC$. From $TB=r=TN$, right angles in $B,N$, and the common $CT$ we see their congruence. (Note that $S$ is the mid point of their hypotenuses.) So $CN=CB$, and from here $\Delta CSB$, $\Delta CSN$ are congruent.
We obtain so far $SB=ST=SN=SC$. In particular, $BTNC$ is cyclic, so there is a common value $y$ for the angles: $$ y = \widehat{TBN}= \widehat{TCN}= \widehat{BCT}. $$ We need one more angle in the list, the other angle $\widehat{EBT}$ in $B$. For this, i could find only a similarity argument. We show that the triangles $\Delta TBE$ and $\Delta SCE$ are similar. The angle in $T$ in the first one is $\hat T =\widehat{ETQ}+\widehat{QTB}=(90^\circ +y)+(90^\circ -x) =180^\circ -x+y$. The same angle is in $S$ in the second triangle, $ \hat S=180^\circ-\widehat{CSP}= 180^\circ-(\widehat{MPS}-\widehat{MCS})=180^\circ-(x-y)$. We need a proportionality. For this we compute: $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{TB}{SC} &= \frac{TB}{SB} =\frac{\sin\widehat {BST}}{\sin\widehat {BTS}} =\frac{\sin 2y}{\sin(90^\circ-y)} =\frac{\sin 2y}{\cos y} \\ &=2\sin y=\frac{2MS}{SC}\ ,\\ \frac{TE}{SE} & =\frac{\sin\widehat {TSE}}{\sin\widehat {ETS}} =\frac{\sin\widehat {TSE}}{\sin\widehat {ETC}} =\frac{\sin (x-y)}{\sin(90^\circ+x)} \\ &= \frac{\sin (x-y)}{\cos x} = \frac{\sin (x-y)}{\sin y}\cdot \frac{\sin y}{\cos x} = \frac{PC}{\color{gray}{PS}}\cdot\frac{MS/SC}{MP/\color{gray}{PS}} \\ &=\frac{PC}{MP}\cdot \frac{MS}{SC}=\frac{2MS}{SC}\ . \end{aligned} $$ This shows the wanted similarity. In particular, the angle $\hat B$ in $\Delta TBE$ is the same one as $y=\hat C$ in $\Delta SCE$. This shows $(f)$.


Note: At this point the OP property is shown.


We continue with the other "bonus" properties from $(e)$. (Maybe a geometric solution can be given using the one or the other property.) Why are $L,T,J$ collinear? The lines $CJA$ and $QLE$ are parallel. (The pairs $Q,C$, $E,A$ are reflected in $D$.) We have $TL\perp QE$, so it is enough to show $TJ\perp AC$. We have $ST=SC=SJ$, $\Delta TJC$ is inscribed in a half-circle, so $\hat J=90^\circ$ in this triangle.

We show the concurrence of $QX,EG,BN$. Let $U$ be the projection of $Q$ on $EG$ in the isosceles $\Delta QEG$. Then by construction $U= EG\cap QX$. Because of the right angles in $L,U$ the quadrilateral $UTLE$ is cyclic, the circumcircle having $TE$ as diameter. We can add $N$ since it is also on this circle. Then $$ \widehat{TUN}= 180^\circ-\widehat{NLT} =90^\circ+\widehat{NLE} =90^\circ+\frac 12(180^\circ-\hat E) =90^\circ+(x+y)\ , \\ \widehat{TUB} =\widehat{QUB} =180^\circ-\hat Q-\hat B =180^\circ-x-(90^\circ+y) =90^\circ-(x+y)\ , $$ and these angles add to $180^\circ$, so the points $B,U,N$ are collinear. The remained collinearity of $N,X,H$ is done by computation.

dan_fulea
  • 37,952