You have correctly understood that, starting from an "original" graph of $f(x)$, the graph of $f(x+1)$ is the original shifted $1$ to the left, and the graph of $2f(x)$ is the original stretched vertically by a factor of $2$.
Your mistake is in interpreting the equation as "when the [graph] $y=f(x)$ is translated to the left by $1$ and becomes $f(x+1)$ (left form), the $y$ of the original function becomes twice as much (right form)". No it does not. Rather it should be : "it (the new graph) becomes twice as much as the original (right form)".
The equation says that for the graph of $f$, a shift one to the left has the same effect as stretching the graph vertically by a factor of $2$. And the graph of any $f$ satisfying the equation, e.g. $f(x) = a\cdot 2^x$ for arbitrary $a\in \mathbb R$, has this property.
And in fact that is what you see: If you shift the graph one to the left and compare it to the original graph, the: At each $x$, the $y$-value $\color{blue}{\text{of this new graph}}$ $\color{green}{\text{is}}$ twice as big as the one of the $\color{red}{\text{original } f}$.
In formula, $\color{blue}{f(x+1)} \color{green}{=} 2\color{red}{f(x)}$.