2

Consider a differentiable function from $\mathbb{R}^2$ to $\mathbb{R}$. Is it correct to say that a function of this type can never be bijective?

I have attempted to prove this by contradiction in the following way, but I'm not sure:

Consider the generic level set $I_z = \{ (x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^2: f(x,y) = z, z \in \mathbb{R} \}$. If $f$ is supposed bijective, then for each $z \in \mathbb{R}$ the cardinality $|I_z|$ = 1. The auxiliary function $g_z(x,y):= f(x,y) - z$ has only one zero, so its sign never changes. Whatever $g_z$'s sign is, the point $(x_z,y_z)\in \mathbb{R}^2$ such that $g_z(x_z,y_z) = 0$ has to be a maximum or a minimum of $g_z$, so $(x_z,y_z)$ has to be a critical point of $g_z$ and $f$. But repeating this for each $z\in \mathbb{R}$ makes the function $f$ constant, so $f$ is not bijective.

I've also found out that usually the implicit function theorem can be used to prove such statements, but I do not know how to use it in this case.

Tom Avery
  • 121

1 Answers1

2

A continuous image of a connected set is connected, Proof of "the continuous image of a connected set is connected"

If your function is bijective and you remove one point from $R^2$ then the image is not connected. So the answer is no.

Steen82
  • 1,258
  • Could you clarify? I do not understand how can this theorem be used to answer my question – Tom Avery Aug 09 '24 at 16:44
  • If the function is differentiable it is continuous, $R^2\setminus{p}$ is connected and since $f$ is bijective $R\setminus{f(p)}$ is not connected. Contradicting that the image of a connected set is a connected set. – Steen82 Aug 09 '24 at 18:28