What is the typical probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ when we talk about a Brownian motion $(B_t)$?
I found some papers used $\Omega = C[0,\infty), \mathcal{F}=\mathcal{B}(C[0,\infty))$, and $P$ being the Wiener measure. The process is then defined by the coordinate mapping process $B(t,\omega) := \omega(t).$
However, in another post, the $\sigma$- algebra $\mathcal{F}$ is taken to be the smallest one for which the projection $\omega \mapsto \omega(t)$ is measurable for each $t$. Moreover, rather than having one probability measue on $(\Omega,F)$ we now have a family $(P^x)$ of probability measures indexed by $x \in \mathbb{R}$. The probability measure is the distribution of $x+B(.),$ where $B$ is standard Brownian motion.
Which one is more typical to use? Are they essentially the same thing?