What would be the measure of the set of continued fractions which only contain 1 or 2 in the denominator, including infinite fractions? If I understand measure correctly, the set of continued fractions with only 1 (or any other number) is 0, since it's a countable list. However, with 2 different numbers, the list becomes uncountable, by a diagonalization argument. I have very little experience with measure theory, but the question seemed interesting.
-
1From Cusick and Flahive: appears you want Rogers (1970) and. Bumby (1973) . C+F page 73, Thm 3, the set of your numbers has Haussdorff dimension between $\frac{1}{3}$ and $\frac{2}{3}$ – Will Jagy Jun 02 '24 at 23:25
-
1I see, Rogers is C. A. Rogers (1970) Haussdorff Measures. Bumby (1973) is in conference proceedings, (Editor Charles Osgood) The Markov spectrum. Pages 25-58 – Will Jagy Jun 02 '24 at 23:30
-
I think this does answer my question, thought I was right to mention my modest experience because this is well above what I can understand, but thank you for the answer. – nnabahi Jun 02 '24 at 23:50
-
1@nnabahi it is also in Khinchin's little book, more accessible. Theorem 29 on page 60 says the set of all numbers in the interval $(0,1)$ with bounded elements. Makes sense, my impression is that Khinchin invented the measure theory of continued fractions. https://archive.org/details/khinchin-continued-fractions – Will Jagy Jun 03 '24 at 00:00
-
Useful searches: "The fractional dimensional theory of continued fractions" (title of Irving John Good's well known 1941 paper) and Jarnik + "Hausdorff dimension" + "continued fraction". – Dave L. Renfro Jun 03 '24 at 00:06
-
Thank you very much! I'm going to take the summer to work through Khinchin's book before delving into anything deeper, this was very helpful! – nnabahi Jun 03 '24 at 00:12
-
I also recommend some Number Theory, especially how continued fractions and the Pell equation fit together. Here is a brief presentation https://ia804708.us.archive.org/33/items/flooved3516/flooved3516.pdf Helpful: my impression is that students get a bit lost with all the subscripts. One type of cure: work through the business with Pell, write out actual fractions (convergents) – Will Jagy Jun 03 '24 at 00:50
1 Answers
Pretty good example, the method that seems to be what Fermat settled on. Continued fraction for $\sqrt{13}.$ Notice that I display no subscripts.
Method described by Prof. Lubin at Continued fraction of $\sqrt{67} - 4$
$$ \sqrt { 13} = 3 + \frac{ \sqrt {13} - 3 }{ 1 } $$ $$ \frac{ 1 }{ \sqrt {13} - 3 } = \frac{ \sqrt {13} + 3 }{4 } = 1 + \frac{ \sqrt {13} - 1 }{4 } $$ $$ \frac{ 4 }{ \sqrt {13} - 1 } = \frac{ \sqrt {13} + 1 }{3 } = 1 + \frac{ \sqrt {13} - 2 }{3 } $$ $$ \frac{ 3 }{ \sqrt {13} - 2 } = \frac{ \sqrt {13} + 2 }{3 } = 1 + \frac{ \sqrt {13} - 1 }{3 } $$ $$ \frac{ 3 }{ \sqrt {13} - 1 } = \frac{ \sqrt {13} + 1 }{4 } = 1 + \frac{ \sqrt {13} - 3 }{4 } $$ $$ \frac{ 4 }{ \sqrt {13} - 3 } = \frac{ \sqrt {13} + 3 }{1 } = 6 + \frac{ \sqrt {13} - 3 }{1 } $$
Simple continued fraction tableau:
$$
\begin{array}{cccccccccccccccccccccccc}
& & 3 & & 1 & & 1 & & 1 & & 1 & & 6 & & 1 & & 1 & & 1 & & 1 & & 6 & \\
\\
\frac{ 0 }{ 1 } & \frac{ 1 }{ 0 } & & \frac{ 3 }{ 1 } & & \frac{ 4 }{ 1 } & & \frac{ 7 }{ 2 } & & \frac{ 11 }{ 3 } & & \frac{ 18 }{ 5 } & & \frac{ 119 }{ 33 } & & \frac{ 137 }{ 38 } & & \frac{ 256 }{ 71 } & & \frac{ 393 }{ 109 } & & \frac{ 649 }{ 180 } \\
\\
& 1 & & -4 & & 3 & & -3 & & 4 & & -1 & & 4 & & -3 & & 3 & & -4 & & 1
\end{array}
$$
$$ \begin{array}{cccc} \frac{ 1 }{ 0 } & 1^2 - 13 \cdot 0^2 = 1 & \mbox{digit} & 3 \\ \frac{ 3 }{ 1 } & 3^2 - 13 \cdot 1^2 = -4 & \mbox{digit} & 1 \\ \frac{ 4 }{ 1 } & 4^2 - 13 \cdot 1^2 = 3 & \mbox{digit} & 1 \\ \frac{ 7 }{ 2 } & 7^2 - 13 \cdot 2^2 = -3 & \mbox{digit} & 1 \\ \frac{ 11 }{ 3 } & 11^2 - 13 \cdot 3^2 = 4 & \mbox{digit} & 1 \\ \frac{ 18 }{ 5 } & 18^2 - 13 \cdot 5^2 = -1 & \mbox{digit} & 6 \\ \frac{ 119 }{ 33 } & 119^2 - 13 \cdot 33^2 = 4 & \mbox{digit} & 1 \\ \frac{ 137 }{ 38 } & 137^2 - 13 \cdot 38^2 = -3 & \mbox{digit} & 1 \\ \frac{ 256 }{ 71 } & 256^2 - 13 \cdot 71^2 = 3 & \mbox{digit} & 1 \\ \frac{ 393 }{ 109 } & 393^2 - 13 \cdot 109^2 = -4 & \mbox{digit} & 1 \\ \frac{ 649 }{ 180 } & 649^2 - 13 \cdot 180^2 = 1 & \mbox{digit} & 6 \\ \end{array} $$
- 146,052
-
I'm sorry I don't see how this answers my question. (because otherwise your comments have been very spot on) – nnabahi Jun 03 '24 at 01:40
-
@nnabahi it is just an example of continued fractions and the Pell equation. As I commented, I think a little exposure to concrete continued fractions, all the numbers filled in, is likely to help your understanding. Up to you. – Will Jagy Jun 03 '24 at 01:43