0

The Wikipedia article Representation theory of the Lorentz group states the following

The complex linear representations of $ \mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C})_{\mathbb{C}} $ stand in one-to-one correspondence with the real linear representations of $ \mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}) $. The set of all real linear irreducible representations of $ \mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}) $ are, thus indexed by a pair $ (\mu, \nu) $

where do these indices come from? what do they represent? also the article latter says they take the values $ 0, \frac{1}{2}, 1, \frac{3}{2}, ... $ why do they take these values?

Callum
  • 6,299
Tomás
  • 271

1 Answers1

0

The article you linked does explain itself in more detail if you keep reading but to put it simply they are half the highest weights. The factor of a half is a physics convention.

The reason for the physics convention (I believe) is as follows. Consider representations of $\mathfrak{su}(2) \cong \mathfrak{so}(3)$. In maths we list the representations of this Lie algebra by their highest weight. Since the rank of these is 1, the weights live in a 1-dimensional space i.e. they are all scales of each other. In fact they are all positive integer scales of the "fundamental weight" so we can represent all irreducble representations by a positive integer. An important question is then which of these Lie algebra representations are also representations of $SO(3)$ and the answer is the ones with highest weight an even multiple of the fundamental weight. To make this distinction more stark, physicists halve the numbers so a representation extends to one for $SO(3)$ if the representative number is an integer. Then $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})_\mathbb{C}$ is just two copies of $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}) = \mathfrak{su}(2)_\mathbb{C}$ so its irreducible representations are just tensor products of an irreducible representation for each copy so can be represented by two integers (or two half integers in the physics system).

Callum
  • 6,299