2

Disclaimer: I'm not a native English speaker and I'm not familiar with the English terms for mathematical objects. I will gladly edit my post based on suggestions concerning grammar mistakes and the correct use of words.

I was trying to solve an integral which proved to be harder than it looks:

\begin{equation} \oint_\gamma dz \frac{1}{z-3\sqrt{z}+2} \end{equation}

where $z\in\mathbb{C}$ and $\gamma(t)=10+7e^{2\pi i t^2}$ for $t\in [0,1]$. The integral can be solved in various ways, but that's not the point. I'm not looking for a solution to this specific integral, I'd like to understand what is the best approach to problems involving square roots and similar polydromic functions, using this exercise as an example. My research led me to many interesting posts, such as this and this, but I feel these articles are either too specific or too general. I always get lost.

Back to the exercise, the square root at the denominator generates two branches, so that we basically have to consider two different functions, one for each foil of the corresponding Riemann surface. Now, obviously:

\begin{equation} z-3\sqrt{z}+2=(\sqrt{z}-2)(\sqrt{z}-1) \end{equation}

which implies that the integrand function has two isolated singularities in $z_1=1$ and $z_2=4$. Only the second singularity is inside $\gamma$. Hence, by the Residue Theorem, I'd say that the integral is equal to the residue of the function in $z_2$:

\begin{equation} \oint_\gamma dz \frac{1}{z-3\sqrt{z}+2} = \lim_{z\to 4} \;(z-4) \frac{1}{z-3\sqrt{z}+2} = \lim_{z\to 4} \frac{\sqrt{z}+2}{\sqrt{z}-1} = 4 \end{equation}

However, checking my professor's follow-along solution, I found out you somehow have to consider the two branches of the square root, for which you have $z_1$ and $z_2$ as singularities in one branch and no singularities for the other one!

I tried to consider $-\sqrt{z}$ as the other branch for the square root, as one would do in $\mathbb{R}$, but the denominator would become $z+3\sqrt{z}+2=(\sqrt{z}+2)(\sqrt{z}+1)$, but this doesn't make things clearer.

To make things worse, the professor's note state that "the other branch gives the values $12$ and $6$ for the same denominator", without specifying anything about those values or how he got them.

Of course, neither WolframAlpha nor ChatGPT give satisfying solutions. WolframAlpha only spits out the result, since I'm not a premium user, and ChatGPT just uses substitution with $w=\sqrt{z}$ without computing the determinator of the Jacobian nor changing $\gamma$ accordingly.

1 Answers1

2

We would like to evaluate the contour integral $I$ given by

$$\begin{align} I&=\oint_{|z-10|=7}\frac{1}{(\sqrt z-1)(\sqrt z-2)}\,dz\\\\ &=\oint_{|z-10|=7}\frac{(\sqrt z+1)(\sqrt z+2)}{( z-1)( z-4)}\,dz \end{align}$$

We observe that the integrand has poles at $z=1$ and $z=4$. In addition there are branch points at $z=0$ and at the point at $\infty$. To evalute $I$, we must, therefore, define the branch on which we are defining the square root function.

If we choose to cut the plane from $z=0$ to $z=\infty$ without intersecting the contour $|z-10|=7$, then the integrand is analytic in and on the contour, except at $z=4$. Applying, the residue theorem, we have

$$I=2\pi i \text{Res}\left(\frac{(\sqrt z+1)(\sqrt z+2)}{( z-1)( z-4)}, z=4\right)=2\pi i \frac{(\sqrt{4}+1)(\sqrt{4}+2)}{3}$$

If we are on the branch with $\sqrt{4}=2$, then $I=i8\pi$. If we are on the branch with $\sqrt{4}=-2$, then $I=0$.

Mark Viola
  • 184,670
  • Thank you. However, shouldn't $I=8\pi I$, since $\sqrt{2}+1=3$ and it cancels with the $3$ at the denominator? Only $\sqrt{4}+2=4$ remains in the residue expression. Anyhow, I have two questions: (1) why do you say there is a branch point at $\infty$? (2) How can the same integral have two different results? If some operator is ambivalent, I'd say it's not well-defined. What am I missing? – propriofede Jan 21 '24 at 10:49
  • Indeed. It is $8\pi$. I've edited. The integral has one value after we define the branch of the square root. And the branch point at infinity is there. To see this, replace $z$ with $w=1/z$ and observe that $w$ has a branch point at zero – Mark Viola Jan 21 '24 at 13:55
  • @propriofede Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. – Mark Viola Jan 22 '24 at 17:38
  • your answer is more than satisfying! I managed to ask my professor directly and wanted to share that yes, the same integral may have different values as one defines the branch cut, but this happens only because the path is running on a different Riemann sheet. In other words, the two values of the "same" integral actually refer to two different integrals: one on the "upper sheet" and the other on the "lower", so that both may include different singularities. At least this is what I understood. – propriofede Jan 23 '24 at 16:45
  • @propriofede Pleased to hear that this was useful! And yes. These are two different integrals, depending on which Riemann sheet they pertain. One cuts the plane, and then proceeds to evaluate the integral on a particular Riemann sheet. Here, there are two sheets. – Mark Viola Jan 23 '24 at 19:22