3

I'm studying economics and I'm having trouble with math calculations.
In my economics textbook, the following equation comes out, and for me it's hard to understand how this relationship is established.
I know a very basic concept of calculus, so could you explain the formula below in detail?
Thank you.
Note. Everything is a continuous concept

  • $t$ is the time index,
  • $\pi(K(t))$ is the profit function with capital($K$),
  • $r$ is the interest rate,
  • $e^{-rt} = (1+r)^t$ (at least in the limit),
  • $q(t)$ is the cost function,
  • $\dot q(t)$ is the time derivative of $q(t)$,
  • $\pi(K(t))=r\cdot q(t)-\dot q(t)$

For arbitrary $T>t$, the relationship below is established.
$$ q(t)=\int\limits_{\tau=t} ^\infty e^{-r(\tau-t)}\pi(K(\tau))d\tau+e^{-r(T-t)}q(T) $$

guest
  • 143
  • 5

1 Answers1

3

It looks like you're doing something along the lines of a present value computation, where you are trying to look at costs into the future; since currency is worth less as time goes on, those costs can be backward-extrapolated to the present day and you can see how much of a burden they are in today's dollars.

You probably remember from calculus that $\int_a^b \frac{d}{dx}f(x)\,dx = f(a)-f(b)$; this is one of the Fundamental Theorems of Calculus and basically it's what we always use to solve integrals. We apply this principle for $f(x)= q(x)e^{-r(x-t)}$, and $a=t$ and $b=T$. Recalling the product and chain rules for derivatives, this yields \begin{align*} \int_t^T\left[\dot q(x)e^{-r(x-t)}-q(x)re^{-r(x-t)}\right]\,dx &= q(T)e^{-r(T-t)}-q(t)e^0 \\ \int_t^T -\left[-\dot q(x)+q(x)r\right]e^{-r(x-t)}\,dx &= q(T)e^{-r(T-t)}-q(t) \\ q(t)-\int_t^T e^{-r(x-t)}\pi(K(x))\,dx &= e^{-r(T-t)}q(T) \\ \end{align*} Adding the integral to both sides yields the given equation, except that the upper limit is $T$ instead of $\infty$.* I suspect your text is taking the limit as $T\to\infty$ (in practical terms: looking at the costs further and further into the future), in which case the $T$ in the integral does become an $\infty$, but we have to figure out what happens to the "extra" right-hand side term for large $T$. So I'm hoping the next bit of the text is devoted to that; but do let me know if I'm off base.

(* And my variable of integration is $x$ instead of $\tau$. This doesn't matter; it's just a name. Remember that when you have $\int_a^b g(x)dx$, all that matters is that you plug in $x=a$ and $x=b$ at the end, and then the $x$ has disappeared. So of course we can just as well call it $\tau$. I chose the notation that stuck closer to a calculus course than to your text so that the theory part would look more familiar.)

  • Yes, you're right! I skipped the latter part(infinity part) because I thought it doesn't matter, but thank you for pointing it out. – guest Sep 26 '23 at 04:43