An object moves in $\mathbb R^3$ it's position $r(t)$ satisfies $$r''(t) = s(t)r(t)$$ for some scalar function $s$ (a central force field, in which all acceleration is directly towards or opposite the origin). Show that
(i) it's motion is confined to a plane and
(ii) it sweeps out equal areas in equal time (Kepler's second law).
My solution is below, to which I request verification and suggestions. Of course, solutions exist, as this problem is centuries old; this question is to verify or improve this solution.
Solution: We first prove claim (i): the object's motion is confined to a plane.
The object starts with arbitrary position $r(0)$ and velocity $r'(0)$. Let their span (which is a plane, a line, or the origin) be $S$. Clearly, $r''(0) \in S$. Since $r''$ has no component orthogonal to $S$, $r'$ remains in $S$, and therefore $r$ remains in $S$. [1]
To prove claim (ii), we introduce $x(t), y(t), z(t),$ and $s(t)$ and, to lighten notation, will omit writing the $(t)$. Assume WLOG that the object's plane is the $xy$ plane so $z = 0$. We then have $$\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2} = sx \\ \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = sy \\ z = 0.$$
The rate that area is swept, $a(t)$, is proportional to $r(t) \times r'(t)$, so $$a(t)k = x \frac{\partial y}{\partial t} - y \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}.$$ But $$\begin{align*} \frac{\partial a}{\partial t} &= x\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}+\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}\frac{\partial y}{\partial t} - \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}\frac{\partial x}{\partial t} - y\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}\\ &= xsy - ysx \\ &= 0 \end{align*}$$ and therefore $a(t)$ is constant, completing the proof.
Note: [1] While geometrically clear, I'm having trouble making this point rigorous. I believe it requires the MVT, but I couldn't apply it successfully. I also tried some form of "continuous induction" using arbitrary small values of $\Delta t$, but this failed to achieve rigor as well. Or is how I've written it good enough?
I don't quite understand the second question. We've already proved $\vec{r}$ should preserve $\frac{d}{dt} \vec{A}$.
– kyle1117 Aug 17 '23 at 03:48