Is the following statement true; "For any odd prime number $p$ , any set of $p-1$ consecutive integers can not be partitioned into two subsets such that the elements of the two sets have equal product." ( I think I read somewhere that Erdos proved it but now I can not remember where I read so , I can only prove the statement for prime of the form $ 4k+3$ , any complete solution or link would be very helpful)
Asked
Active
Viewed 122 times
1
-
1Isn't it true more generally that the product of (any number of) consecutive integers can't be a square? can't be a $k$th power for any $k\ge2$? – Gerry Myerson Aug 13 '13 at 12:05
-
1No, but I've given you a link. See also http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/33338/product-of-consecutive-integers-is-not-a-power – Gerry Myerson Aug 13 '13 at 12:11
1 Answers
4
Erdos and Selfridge, The product of consecutive integers is never a power, Illinois J Math 19 (1975) 292-301.
Glorfindel
- 4,000
Gerry Myerson
- 185,413