From Wolfram Functions we have the following identities for the hypergeometric function $_2F_1$: $$\begin{align} _2F_1\left(a,c-b;c;\tfrac{z}{z-1}\right)&=(1-z)^a\,_2F_1(a,b;c;z)\tag1\\ _2F_1\left(a,a+\tfrac12;c;z(2-z)\right)&=\left(1-\tfrac{z}2\right)^{-2a}\,_2F_1\left(2a,2a-c+1;c;\tfrac{z}{2-z}\right)\tag2\\ _2F_1\left(a,b;2b;\tfrac{4z}{(z+1)^2}\right)&=(1+z)^{2a}\,_2F_1\left(a,a-b+\tfrac12;b+\tfrac12;z^2\right),\tag3 \end{align}$$ where $$_2F_1(a,b;c;z)=\frac{\Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(b)\Gamma(c-b)}\int_0^1t^{b-1}(1-t)^{c-b-1}(1-zt)^{-a}dt.\tag{$\star$}$$ As a recreational project, I have been trying to prove the three above identities using $(\star)$.
So far, I've been able to prove $(1)$. The proof is very simple and uses transformation $t\mapsto1-t$ in the integral. The identity follows immediately after simplification.
This prompted me to try to prove the other two identities using substitutions in the integral $(\star)$
At this point, I have been able to rewrite $(2)$ as $$\,_2F_1\left(2a,2a-c+1;c;z\right)=(1+z)^{-2a}\,_2F_1\left(a,a+\tfrac12;c;\tfrac{4z}{(z+1)^2}\right)$$ via the substitution $\tfrac{z}{2-z}\mapsto z$.This rewritten form looks very similar to $(3)$, suggesting that they are related. Beyond this I have no leads.
I have however examined the function $$U(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta;z)=\int_0^1(1+t)^\alpha t^\beta (1-t)^\gamma (1-zt)^\delta dt,$$ considering its transformation identities given by substitutions which send $[0,1]$ to itself in the integral. This seems related, as clearly $$_2F_1(a,b;c;z)=\frac{\Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(b)\Gamma(c-b)}U(0,b-1,c-b-1,-a;z).$$ For example, the substitution $t\mapsto \tfrac{1-t}{1+t}$ gives the identity $$U(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta;z)=2^{1+\alpha+\gamma}(1-z)^{-\delta}U\left(-\alpha-\beta-\gamma-\delta-2,\gamma,\beta,\delta;\frac{z+1}{z-1}\right).$$ And while setting $\alpha=\beta+\gamma+\delta+2=0$ yields $$\,_2F_1(-\delta,\beta+1;\beta+\gamma+2;z)=2^{\gamma+1}(1-z)^{-\delta}\,_2F_1\left(-\delta,\gamma+1;\beta+\gamma+2;\frac{z+1}{z-1}\right),$$ this is not one of the transformation identities I was trying to prove.
So, I would like some hints on how to prove $(2)$ and $(3)$, if it is possible just using the integral $(\star)$.