I am wondering whether such an operator can exist.
It is a bounded linear operator defined on a Hilbert space. It is injective. It is not surjective (its image is not the whole of the Hilbert space). Its inverse defined on the image is bounded.
I am asking because in Lax's book 'functional analysis', chapter 20, he states that 'by definition, a bounded linear operator $M$ is invertible iff it maps H onto H in a one-to-one fashion', and that $M$ can fail to be invertible only in two ways: (i) $M$ is not 1-1; (ii) $M$ is not onto.
The problem is, while for $M$ to be invertible, of course it should be one-to-one, but why should it also be onto?