As evidence that you cannot expect an "abstract nonsense" proof of this, the corresponding statement for Jónsson-Tarski algebras is false. A Jónsson-Tarski algebra is a set $X$ together with a binary operation $w:X\times X\to X$ and a pair of unary operations $p,q:X\to X$ such that $w$ and $(p,q):X\to X\times X$ are inverse to each other. So, a topological Jónsson-Tarski algebra can be described as a topological space $X$ together with a homeomorphism $X\times X\to X$. In particular, for instance, $\{0,1\}^\mathbb{N}$ is a profinite set which admits a topological Jónsson-Tarski algebra structure. However, $\{0,1\}^\mathbb{N}$ cannot be an inverse limit of finite Jónsson-Tarski algebras, since a finite Jónsson-Tarski algebra has at most one element (if $X$ is a finite set with more than one element then $|X\times X|\neq |X|$!).
So, any proof of this statement for groups is going to need to use something special about groups beyond just that they are a type of algebraic structure.
(As Alex Kruckman commented on the question, you can find more examples and discussion of this question in general in Peter Johnstone's book Stone spaces, specifically in section VI.2. In particular, VI.2.8-9 explores some sufficient conditions on a variety of algebras under which you can generalize the usual argument for profinite groups to show that inverse limits of finite algebras coincide with topological algebras whose underlying space is a profinite set.)