4

As an operator on functions, one intuitive way to think about the Laplacian is as an operator that returns the average difference between a function's value at a point and the values of its neighbouring points. This works in both smooth and discrete settings, for example

  1. Smooth: In $\mathbb{R}^n$, this answer explains how the Laplacian $\Delta f(\mathbf{0})$ at $\mathbf{0}$ of a function $f \in C^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is limit of the (scaled) average difference $$ \Delta f(0) = \lim_{r \to 0^+} \dfrac{2nr}{r^2} \dfrac{1}{\omega(S_r)} \int_{S_r} (f(\mathbf{x}) - f(\mathbf{0}) ) d\omega(\mathbf{x}) $$ in a sphere around $\mathbf{0}$.
  2. Discrete: For a graph $G$ with degree matrix $D$ and adjacency matrix $A$, the normalised graph Laplacian is the operator on the $0$-cochains of the graph $$ L_G = I - D^{-1}A : C^0(G; \mathbb{R}) \to C^0(G;\mathbb{R}).$$ This has a similar interpretation of averaging the difference over a function, using graph theoretical neighbourhoods instead of spheres in $\mathbb{R}^n$.

Suppose now we have a Riemannian manifold $M$, and we construct the De Rham complex $$ \Omega^0(M) \xrightarrow{d^0} \Omega^1(M) \xrightarrow{d^1} \Omega^2(M) \xrightarrow{d^2} \ldots $$ where $d$ is the exterior derivative. The Riemannian structure allows us to define an adjoint to the exterior derivative and the Laplace-Hodge operator $$ \Delta_n = (d^n)^\dagger d^n + d^{n-1} (d^{n-1})^\dagger $$ for any $n \geq 0$.

My Question: For $n > 0$, is there a way to think of $\Delta_n$ as comparing local averages of $n$-forms, similar to the way that $\Delta_0$ does for smooth functions?

In particular, any ideas on whether this works when $n =1$ would be much appreciated!

D.R.
  • 10,556
  • I found some preliminary ideas: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/490522/why-is-the-laplacian-on-differential-forms-defined-as-delta-d-delta-delt (though I didn't really like these answers), and https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1376956/hodge-theory-intuition where a comment recommends Introduction to the book of S.Rosenberg "The Laplacian on a Riemannian manifold" – D.R. Jun 20 '25 at 02:59

0 Answers0