2

Recall that one definition of the Hopf map is given by $\eta:S^3 \rightarrow S^2:(z_0,z_1) \mapsto z_0/z_1$, where $S^3$ is the unit sphere in $\mathbb{C}^2$ and $S^2 = \mathbb{C} \cup \infty$.

Here is an exercise related to this:

Show that $k\eta \simeq \eta k^2$, where $k$ and $k^2$ denote maps of degree $k$ and $k^2$, respectively.

The notion of degree that I'm used to is the degree of a map $f:S^n \rightarrow S^n$ with $n > 0$. It doesn't seem like $\eta$, for instance, is a map of this form, but I think that we can still make sense of its degree by thinking of the degree of $\eta$ restricted to $S^2 \subseteq S^3$.

We know that if $\text{deg}(f) = \text{deg}(g)$, then $f \simeq g$. We also know that $\text{deg}(fg) = \text{deg}(f) \cdot \text{deg}(g)$. Lastly, we know that if $f$ is not surjective, then its degree is $0$. We will use all of these facts to our advantage below.

Hence, we can show that $k \eta \simeq \eta k^2$ by showing that $\text{deg}(k \eta) = \deg(\eta k^2)$. We have $\deg(k \eta) = \deg(k) \cdot \deg(\eta) = k \cdot \deg(\eta)$ and $\deg(\eta k^2) = \deg(\eta) \cdot \deg(k^2) = k^2 \cdot \deg(\eta)$. Thus, to show the desired equality $\text{deg}(k \eta) = \deg(\eta k^2)$, it suffices to show that $\deg(\eta) = 0$.

Is it really true that the degree of the Hopf map is equal to $0$ when restricted to $S^2$? Such is commented on the post here, but I can't see why this true. One way we could show this is by showing that the Hopf map is not surjective when restricted to $S^2$ -- is this true? Can we see this simply from how the Hopf map is defined above?

Thanks!

0 Answers0