I'm trying to provide an answer, which is based on the claim that $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple if and only if $\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbb{R}}$ is semisimple here if $\mathfrak{g}$ has finite dimension. (I'm not sure that this result is correct when $\mathfrak{g}$ has infinite dimension).
Lemma. Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over a field for characteristic $0$ and $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})$ its radical. Then for an ideal $\mathfrak{h}\subset \mathfrak{g}$, $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h}$ is semisimple if and only if $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})\subset \mathfrak{h}$.
$\Leftarrow$: $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h} \cong (\mathfrak{g}/\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g}))/(\mathfrak{h}/\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g}))$ is a quotient of $\mathfrak{g}/\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})$, hence being semisimple.
$\Rightarrow$: $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})/(\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})\cap \mathfrak{h})\cong (\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g}) + \mathfrak{h})/\mathfrak{h}$ is an ideal of $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h}$, hence being semisimple. But it's also solvable, being quotient of the solvable algebra $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})$. So $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})/(\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})\cap \mathfrak{h}) = \{0\}$, $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})\subset \mathfrak{h}$.
(I doubt that this proof works only for $\mathfrak{g}$ being over a field for characteristic $0$. There is also another approach also works only for such $\mathfrak{g}$: from this question, $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{h})$ is an ideal of $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})$ and $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h})\cong \mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})/\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{h})$, so $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h}$ semisimple $\Leftrightarrow \mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{h}) = \mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g}) \Leftrightarrow \mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})\subset \mathfrak{h}$.)
Now for the original question, we have $\mathfrak{g}/\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})$ being semisimple, so $\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbb{R}}/\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})_{\mathbb{R}} = (\mathfrak{g}/\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g}))_{\mathbb{R}}$ is semisimple. From the lemma above we know that $\mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g}_\mathbb{R})\subset \mathrm{rad}(\mathfrak{g})_{\mathbb{R}}$. Hence these two are equal.