1

Let $N = q^k n^2$ be an odd perfect number with special/Eulerian prime $q$ satisfying $q \equiv k \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $\gcd(q,n)=1$. Denote the Euler-totient function of the positive integer $x$ by $\varphi(x)$, and the classical sum of divisors of $x$ by $\sigma(x)=\sigma_1(x)$.

MOTIVATION

From the following source: Advanced Problem H-661, On Odd Perfect Numbers, Proposed by J. L´opez Gonz´alez, Madrid, Spain and F. Luca, Mexico (Vol. 45, No. 4, November 2007), Fibonacci Quarterly, we have the bounds $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(N)}{N} < \frac{1}{2}.$$

However, we also have $$\frac{\varphi(N)}{N} = \frac{\varphi(q^k)}{q^k}\cdot\frac{\varphi(n)}{n}.$$ Notice that $$\frac{4}{5} \leq \frac{\varphi(q^k)}{q^k} = \frac{q^k \bigg(1 - \frac{1}{q}\bigg)}{q^k} = \frac{q - 1}{q} < 1.$$ Therefore, we have the bounds $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(N)}{N} = \frac{\varphi(q^k)}{q^k}\cdot\frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n},$$ and $$\frac{4}{5}\cdot\frac{\varphi(n)}{n} \leq \frac{\varphi(N)}{N} = \frac{\varphi(q^k)}{q^k}\cdot\frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{1}{2},$$ which implies that $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{5}{8}.$$

WolframAlpha gives the rational approximation $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} \approx 0.4600409433626.$$

Harking back from this answer to a closely related question, we have the following proposition:

THEOREM A: Let $q^k n^2$ be an odd perfect number with special prime $q$. Then we have the following implication: $$\frac{\varphi(n)}{n} > \frac{1}{2} \implies q = 5.$$

PROOF: Let $q^k n^2$ be an odd perfect number with special prime $q$, and suppose that $$\frac{\varphi(n)}{n} > \frac{1}{2}.$$ From the equation and lower bound for $\varphi(N)/N$ $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(N)}{N} = \frac{\varphi(q^k)}{q^k}\cdot\frac{\varphi(n)}{n}$$ and the equation $$\frac{\varphi(q^k)}{q^k} = \frac{q - 1}{q},$$ we get the lower bound $$2\cdot\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)}\cdot\frac{q}{q - 1} < \frac{2\varphi(n)}{n} = x.$$ This implies that we have the upper bound $$q < \frac{x}{x-1} < \frac{2\cdot\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)}\cdot\frac{q}{q - 1}}{\bigg(2\cdot\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)}\cdot\frac{q}{q - 1}\bigg) - 1}$$ which can be solved using WolframAlpha, yielding the upper bound $$q < \frac{217\zeta(3)}{217\zeta(3) - 240} \approx 12.5128,$$ from which it follows that $q=5$, since $q$ is a prime satisfying $q \equiv 1 \pmod 4$. QED

Note that the estimate $$\frac{\varphi(n)}{n} > \frac{1}{2}$$ was used to justify $$0 < q < \frac{x}{x-1}.$$


We now endeavor/attempt to prove the estimate $$\frac{\varphi(n)}{n} > \frac{1}{2}.$$

To do so, consider the equation $$\frac{2q}{q+1}=\frac{n}{\varphi(n)}.$$ (This is not random guesswork - it emanates from considering the inequalities $$\frac{\sigma(n^2)}{n^2} < \frac{n^2}{\varphi(n^2)} = \frac{n}{\varphi(n)}$$ $$\frac{\sigma(n^2)}{n^2} = \frac{2q^k}{\sigma(q^k)} \leq \frac{2q}{q+1},$$ and determining whether the right-hand sides are equal.)

Since $q \equiv 1 \pmod 4$, then $(q+1)/2$ is an integer, so that we may rewrite $$\frac{2q}{q+1}=\frac{n}{\varphi(n)}$$ as $$q\varphi(n)=\bigg(\frac{q+1}{2}\bigg)\cdot{n}.$$

Since $\gcd(q,n)=1$, then $n \mid \varphi(n)$. This contradicts $$\frac{1}{2}<\frac{\varphi(n)}{n}=\frac{q+1}{2q}=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2q} \leq \frac{3}{5}.$$


An alternative proof goes by observing that $$\gcd(q,n)=\gcd\Bigg(q,\frac{q+1}{2}\Bigg)=\gcd\Bigg(q,\frac{q+1}{2}\cdot{n}\Bigg)=1$$ which contradicts $$q \mid \Bigg(\frac{q+1}{2}\cdot{n}\Bigg).$$


Thus, either $$\frac{1}{2} < \frac{q+1}{2q} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{5}{8}$$ or $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{q+1}{2q} < \frac{3}{5}$$ holds.


Here are our:

QUESTIONS

(1) Do you see a quick way to improve on these bounds, using the ideas we have given in this post, and possibly even more?

(2) If the bounds can be improved, can you show how?

(3) If the bounds cannot be improved, can you explain why?

1 Answers1

0

Adding this other answer for another perspective on the issue at hand.

Let $N = q^k n^2$ be an odd perfect number with special prime $q$.

Harking back from this closely related question, we have the equation $$\frac{\sigma(N)}{\varphi(N)}=2\cdot\frac{q}{q-1}\cdot\frac{n}{\varphi(n)}$$ from which we obtain $$\dfrac{\dfrac{\varphi(n)}{n}}{\dfrac{\varphi(N)}{N}}=\frac{q}{q-1}$$ since $N$ is perfect implies $\sigma(N)/N=2$.


From the earlier answer to this question, we have that $$\frac{3}{5} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{5}{8} \iff q = 5$$ and $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{3}{5} \iff q \geq 13.$$ Also, from the original post, we have $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(N)}{N} < \frac{1}{2}.$$


We now test whether, indeed, $q=5$ follows from $$\dfrac{\dfrac{\varphi(n)}{n}}{\dfrac{\varphi(N)}{N}}=\frac{q}{q-1}$$ and the inequalities $$\frac{3}{5} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{5}{8}$$ $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(N)}{N} < \frac{1}{2}.$$

So we are supposed to solve the inequality $$\frac{6}{5} = \dfrac{(3/5)}{(1/2)} < \frac{q}{q-1} < \dfrac{(5/8)}{(120/217\zeta(3))} = \frac{217\zeta(3)}{192}.$$ Asking WolframAlpha to solve our inequality gives the solution $$3.78882 \approx \dfrac{217\zeta(3)}{217\zeta(3) - 192} < q < 6,$$ confirming the expected $q=5$.


We now test whether, indeed, $q \geq 13$ follows from $$\dfrac{\dfrac{\varphi(n)}{n}}{\dfrac{\varphi(N)}{N}}=\frac{q}{q-1}$$ and the inequalities $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{3}{5}$$ $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(N)}{N} < \frac{1}{2}.$$

So we are supposed to solve the inequality $$\frac{240}{217\zeta(3)} = \dfrac{(120/217\zeta(3))}{(1/2)} < \frac{q}{q-1} < \dfrac{(3/5)}{(120/217\zeta(3))} = \frac{217\zeta(3)}{200}.$$

Notice that $$\frac{240}{217\zeta(3)} \approx 0.92$$ whence $$\frac{240}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{q}{q-1} = 1 + \frac{1}{q-1}$$ is trivial.

Hence, we replace the lower bound by $$1 < \frac{q}{q - 1}$$ so that we can now solve the inequality $$1 < \frac{q}{q - 1} < \frac{217\zeta(3)}{200}.$$ Asking WolframAlpha to solve our inequality gives the solution $$q > \dfrac{217\zeta(3)}{217\zeta(3) - 200} \approx 4.28697$$ which neither confirms nor contradicts the expected $q \geq 13$.


We now test whether, indeed, $q \geq 13$ follows from $$\dfrac{\dfrac{\varphi(n)}{n}}{\dfrac{\varphi(N)}{N}}=\frac{q}{q-1}$$ and the inequalities $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(n)}{n} < \frac{1}{2}$$ $$\frac{120}{217\zeta(3)} < \frac{\varphi(N)}{N} < \frac{1}{2}.$$

From the previous section, it suffices to consider the inequality $$\frac{q}{q-1} < \dfrac{(1/2)}{(120/217\zeta(3))} = \frac{217\zeta(3)}{240}.$$

We can now solve the inequality $$1 < \frac{q}{q - 1} < \frac{217\zeta(3)}{240}.$$ Asking WolframAlpha to solve our inequality gives the solution $$q > \dfrac{217\zeta(3)}{217\zeta(3) - 240} \approx 12.5128$$ which confirms the expected $q \geq 13$.