0

Say, I have the following integral: $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) \delta(x-y) \, dx = f(y) \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta(x-y) \, dx = f(y).$$

Again consider the following integral: $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(y) \delta(x-y) \, dx = f(y) \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta(x-y) \, dx = f(y).$$

My Question

In this case, is $$f(x) \delta(x-y) = f(y) \delta(x-y) \, ?$$

The reason I am hesitating to conclude that (using Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) is $f(x) \delta(x-y)$ not being a function (strictly speaking) due to the presence of the Dirac delta 'function'. For more details, see here.

Although, it is quite common in Physics, for instance, here in the normalization of one-particle states.

rainman
  • 871
  • Why can $f(y)$ go out of integral, at first case? –  Nov 10 '21 at 01:49
  • In the first case, $f(x)$ is assumed to be some ordinary function. The product $f(x) \delta(x-y)$ is zero everywhere except at $x = y$. It follows that $f(x) \delta(x-y) = f(y) \delta(x-y)$. The integration is wrt $x$ and hence $f(y)$ is pulled out of the integration being a constant. – rainman Nov 10 '21 at 06:03

1 Answers1

1

Yes. As you say, both of them are equal to $f(x)\delta(0)$ when $x=y,$ while they are equal to $0$ when $x\neq y.$

I think maybe the point you're confused about is how to define "equal" for non-ordinary functions, and how to understand "multiply" for non-ordinary functions like $f(x)\delta(x-y)$. You can see generalized function for help.

In brief, $\delta(x)$ can be seen as a functional on $C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n),$ which acts as $$\langle \delta(x), h(x)\rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\delta(x) h(x)dx=h(0),\quad \forall h\in C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n),$$ so for given $y$, $h\in C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$, $$ \begin{aligned} \langle f(x)\delta(x-y),h(x)\rangle &=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}f(x)\delta(x-y) h(x)dx=f(y)h(y)\\ &=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}f(y)\delta(x-y)h(x)dx=\langle f(y)\delta(x-y),h(x)\rangle \end{aligned}$$ Thus regarded as functional on $C^\infty(\mathbb{R^n_x})$, for any give $y,$ $f(x)\delta(x-y)=f(y)\delta(x-y).$

DreamAR
  • 986
  • In the definition of $\langle \delta, h \rangle$, the integral is $h(x)$. Should it be $h(0)$? Or maybe I am missing the point? – rainman Nov 10 '21 at 09:58
  • 1
    @rainman I obmit $(x)$ to emphasize that it works on function $h$, rather than value $h(x)$ for each $x$. And the last value should be $h(0)$. I made a mistake and had corrected it. – DreamAR Nov 10 '21 at 10:10