I read these threads: 1, 2, 3, but my question is somewhat simpler, maybe trivial — sorry in advance, if this is the case.
How do we prove, in the general case, that the canonical inclusion is indeed an inclusion?
By using a couple of times the universal property of the tensor product (on different environments) we build a linear map, let's say $F: V_1^\ast\otimes\dots\otimes V_n^\ast \to(V_1\otimes\dots\otimes V_n)^\ast$, such that:
$$F(\phi_1\otimes\dots\otimes\phi_n)\left(\boldsymbol{v}_1\otimes \dots\otimes\boldsymbol{v}_n\right)=\phi_1(\boldsymbol{v}_1)\dots\phi_n(\boldsymbol{v}_n);$$
for any $(\phi_1,\dots,\phi_n)\in V_1^\ast\times\dots\times V_n^\ast$ and $(\boldsymbol{v}_1, \dots,\boldsymbol{v}_n)\in V_1\times\dots\times V_n$; so… how do we get that $F$ is injective?
I'm ok with the finite-dimensional case, but I can't see how to adapt its proof to the general case: the one I'm aware of rests upon the fact that each linear functional (covector) can be decomposed on the dual basis.
Of course I tried to show that the kernel of $F$ is trivial; now, I can see why — hope what I'm about to write is not wrong — if $F$ vanishes on a simple tensor $\phi_1\otimes\dots\otimes\phi_n$, then this latter vanishes too; but then $V_1^\ast\otimes\dots\otimes V_n^\ast$ is made up of all the finite sums of such tensors, so how do I manage such a case?
I'm not familiar with categories, so, in order to be sure that I can follow your answer, please keep things as simple as possible; eg, should pairings, evaluation contractions, and/or canonical isomorphisms be needed, please don't give for granted that I'm already able to follow you on everything.