1

This questions comes from Royden Chapter 5 on page 106. I am able to answer the question if we add the assumption $f$ is bounded.

Assuming $f$ is not necessarily bounded, here is my idea.

Consider the set $A_c=\{x\in [a,b] : f(x)<c\}$. We need to show that for each $c\in \mathbb{R}$ this set is measurable.

Now, if we consider $f|_{A_c}:A_c\mapsto \mathbb{R}$, then we can use the fact that a bounded function whose set of discontinuouties has measure zero must be Riemann integrable.

Then we can say, using boundedness, Riemann integrability on $A_c$ $\implies$ Lesbesgue Measurable on $A_c$ $\implies$ $f|_{A_c}$ is measurable on ${A_c}$.

In particular, $\{x\in A_c : f|_{A_c}(x)<c\}=\{x\in [a,b] : f(x)<c\}=A_c$ is measurable.

This concludes my attempt.

Does this seem reasonable?

Arctic Char
  • 16,972
Jungleshrimp
  • 1,605
  • 3
    I have no idea what it even means to say $f|_{A_c}$ is Riemann integrable, since its domain is not an interval. Those results you use about the Riemann integral: have you actually seen them stated and proved for functions with domain an arbitrary subset of $[a,b]$??? – David C. Ullrich Apr 29 '21 at 20:03
  • You can define $f_{A_c(x)} = f(x)$ for $x \in A_c,$ on $[a,b]$ and $0$ otherwise on $[a,b]$. Then you define the integral over a bounded set in the obvious way. Then you prove that this definition of integral does not depend on the interval $[a,b].$ – Johan Aspegren May 01 '21 at 16:20

3 Answers3

1

If it's true for bounded functions the result for unbounded functions follows.

For $B>0$ define $\psi_B:\Bbb C\to\Bbb C$ by $$\psi_B(z)=\begin{cases}z,&(|z|\le B),\\B\frac z{|z|},&(|z|>B).\end{cases}$$Let $$f_B=\psi_B\circ f.$$Now since $\psi_B$ is continuous, $f_B$ is continuous almost everywhere. And $|f_B|\le B$. So $f_B$ is measurable, and $f_B\to f$ almost everywhere as $B\to\infty$, so $f$ is measurable.

quid
  • 42,835
1

This seems like too much work, hopefully someone will provide a more succinct answer.

Let $E$ be the set of discontinuities. Write $f = f \cdot 1_E + f \cdot 1_{E^c}$.

Since $E$ is a null set and the Lebesgue measure is complete, it follows that $f \cdot 1_E$ is measurable, so we can concentrate on $g=f \cdot 1_{E^c}$.

Define $g_n(x) = \sup \{ g(y) | |x-y| < {1 \over n} \}$ and note that $g_n$ is lsc. and hence measurable. Let $h(x) = \lim_n g_n(x)$ and since $g_n \to h$ we see that $h$ is measurable.

If $x \in E^c$ we see that $h(x) = f(x)$ and since $h(x) = g(x)$ ae. (and the Lebesgue measure is complete) we can conclude that $g$ is measurable.

copper.hat
  • 178,207
0

Let $C_{1}=\{x\in[a,b]\mid f\mbox{ is continuous at }x\}$ and $C_{2}=[a,b]\setminus C_{1}$. Let $c\in\mathbb{R}$ be given and define $A=\{x\in[a,b]\mid f(x)<c\}$. Note that $A\cap C_{2}$ is a subset of the Lebesgue measure-zero set $C_{1}$, so $A\cap C_{2}$ is Lebesgue measurable.

Next, we go to show that $C_{1}$ is a $G_{\delta}$ subset of $[a,b]$. Let $$ B_{n}=\{x\in[a,b]\mid\exists\delta>0\mbox{ s.t. }|f(s)-f(t)|<\frac{1}{n}\mbox{ whenever } s,t\in[a,b]\cap(x-\delta,x+\delta)\}. $$ We assert that $B_{n}$ is an open subset of $[a,b]$ and that $C_{1}=\cap_{n}B_{n}$. Let $x\in B_{n}$. Choose $\delta>0$ such that $|f(s)-f(t)|<\frac{1}{n}\mbox{ whenever } s,t\in[a,b]\cap(x-\delta,x+\delta).$ Let $r=\delta/2$. Let $y\in[a,b]\cap(x-r,x+r)$ be arbitrary. Let $\delta'=\delta/4$. Observe that $y-\delta'\geq x-r-\delta'>x-\delta$ and $y+\delta'\leq x+r+\delta'<x+\delta$. It follows that $(y-\delta',y+\delta')\subseteq(x-\delta,x+\delta)$. Hence, for any $s,t\in[a,b]\cap(y-\delta',y+\delta')$, we have $|f(s)-f(t)|<\frac{1}{n}$. This shows that $y\in B_{n},$ so $[a,b]\cap(x-r,x+r)\subseteq B_{n}$. Therefore, $B_{n}$ is an open subset of $[a,b]$.

That $C_{1}\subseteq\cap_{n}B_{n}$ follows from the definition of continuity (and triangle inequality). To prove the reverse inclusion, let $x\in\cap_{n}B_{n}$. Let $\varepsilon>0$ be given. Choose $n$ such that $\frac{1}{n}<\varepsilon$. Since $x\in B_{n}$, we can choose $\delta>0$ such that $|f(s)-f(t)|<\frac{1}{n}\mbox{ whenever } s,t\in[a,b]\cap(x-\delta,x+\delta).$ In particular, for any $t\in[a,b]\cap(x-\delta,x+\delta)$, we have that $|f(x)-f(t)|<\frac{1}{n}<\varepsilon$. Therefore $x\in C_{1}$. This shows that $\cap_{n}B_{n}\subseteq C_{1}$.

Let $g=f\mid_{C_{1}}$, the restriction of $f$ on $C_{1}$, then $g$ is a continuous function. Therefore, $g^{-1}\left((-\infty,c)\right)$ is an open subset of $C_{1}$ (with respect to the relative topology). Choose an open set $U\subseteq\mathbb{R}$ such that $g^{-1}\left((-\infty,c)\right)=U\cap C_{1}$. On the other hand, notice that $g^{-1}\left((-\infty,c)\right)=A\cap C_{1}$. Therefore $A\cap C_{1}=U\cap C_{1}$, which is Lebesbue measurable.

Finally, $A=(A\cap C_{1})\cup(A\cap C_{2})$, which is Lebesgue measurable.

  • Remark: Oh... I over look something. To show that $A\cap C_1$ is measurable, we do not need to show that $C_1$ is $G_\delta$. In fact, $A\cap C_1 = U\cap C_1$ is enough to establish that $A\cap C_1$ is Lebesgue measurable because $C_1$, being $[a,b]\setminus C_2$, is Lebesgue measurable. – Danny Pak-Keung Chan Apr 29 '21 at 20:14