In lecture I learned the following definition of valuation: Let $(K,+,\cdot)$ be a field and let $(G,+)$ be a totally ordered group. A map $v: K \longrightarrow G\cup\{\infty\}$ is a valuation if the following properties hold:
- $v(ab) = v(a)+v(b)$
- $v(a+b) \ge \min\{v(a),v(b)\}$
- $v(a) = \infty \iff a = 0$
Then we proved that:
- $v(1) = 0$
- $v(a^{-1}) = -v(a)$
- $v(-a) = v(a)$
- $v(a - b) \ge \min\{v(a), v(b)\}$
Later in the lecture we used the "easy fact" that
$$ \text{If }v(a) \ne v(b), \text{ then } v(a+b) = \min\{v(a), v(b)\}$$ I do not understand why this is true. I looked on Wikipedia and there they define a valuation to so that it has this property. But is it possible to derive this from my definition?