I won't answer the question directly, but I'll give you a vivid view of the underlying algebra, which shows how the hexagon arises.
The linear Poisson bracket associated with $U(3)$ is determined from the following:
$$\{q^i_j, q^k_l\} = δ^k_j q^i_l - δ^i_l q^k_j, \hspace 1em (i,j,k,l ∈ \{1,2,3\}),$$
where $δ^k_j$ is the Kroenecker delta ($δ^k_j = 1$ if $k = j$, $δ^k_j = 0$ if $k ≠ j$). The coadjoint orbits of $SU(3)$ comprise the symplectic leaves within this Poisson manifold for which $T = q^1_1 + q^2_2 + q^3_3 = 0$. On all of the symplectic leaves of this manifold, $T$ is an invariant: the "trace" invariant, itself. So, the constraint $T = 0$ yields the symplectic leaves associated with the trace-zero subalgebra $su(3)$ of $u(3)$.
The remaining $q$ coordinates can be arrayed as:
$$(R,O,Y,G,B,P) = \left(q^1_2, q^1_3, q^2_3, q^2_1, q^3_1, q^3_2\right),$$
reminiscent of the colors {"red", "orange", "yellow", "green", "blue", "purple"} on a color wheel. Defining
$$H(Θ) = \frac{q^1_1 - q^2_2}{2} \cos Θ + \frac{q^1_1 + q^2_2 - 2 q^3_3}{2 \sqrt{3}} \sin Θ,$$
one can write:
$$\begin{align}
\{R, G\} &= 2 H(0˚) &= q^1_1 - q^2_2, \\
\{Y, P\} &= 2 H(120˚) &= q^2_2 - q^3_3, \\
\{B, O\} &= 2 H(240˚) &= q^3_3 - q^1_1.
\end{align}$$
Those are three of the six cardinal points of a hexagon, the other three being their respective negatives
$$\begin{align}
\{G, R\} &= 2 H(180˚) &= q^2_2 - q^1_1, \\
\{P, Y\} &= 2 H(300˚) &= q^3_3 - q^2_2, \\
\{O, B\} &= 2 H(60˚) &= q^1_1 - q^3_3.
\end{align}$$
The remaining Poisson brackets for the "colored" coordinates are:
$$
\{R, Y\} = O, \hspace 1em \{Y, B\} = G, \hspace 1em \{B, R\} = P,\\
\{G, O\} = Y, \hspace 1em \{O, P\} = R, \hspace 1em \{P, G\} = B,
$$
with the remaining brackets, for "adjacent" elements all being zero:
$$
\{R, O\} = \{O, Y\} = \{Y, G\} = \{G, B\} = \{B, P\} = \{P, R\} = 0.$$
The toroidal sub-algebra is associated with the coordinates $H(Θ)$, which satisfy the identities:
$$H(Θ) \cos Θ' + H(Θ + 90˚) \sin Θ' = H(Θ + Θ'), \hspace 1em \{H(Θ), H(Θ')\} = 0.$$
The remaining fundamental brackets are given by:
$$\begin{align}
\{H(Θ), R\} &= \cos Θ R, &\hspace 1em \{H(Θ), O\} &= \cos(Θ - 60˚) O, \\
\{H(Θ), Y\} &= \cos(Θ - 120˚) Y, &\hspace 1em \{H(Θ), G\} &= \cos (Θ - 180˚) G, \\
\{H(Θ), B\} &= \cos(Θ - 240˚) B, &\hspace 1em \{H(Θ), P\} &= \cos(Θ - 300˚) P.
\end{align}$$
So, when they use the term "color" for the charge associated with $SU(3)$, in quantum chromodynamics, they really do mean color. The analogy runs deep. The coordinates $H(0˚)$ and $H(90˚)$ play the analogous role of "chromaticity coordinates", while $T$ - which is factored out when going from $u(3)$ to $su(3)$ - plays the role of "brightness". The hexagon is the color wheel, itself.