I see it claimed that $(\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)^*$ is a cyclic group, but it doesn't seem to me that it has a generator. It is the set $\{0,1\}$, both elements of which are their own square. So it seems to me that each element has order $1$ and the group is not cyclic. Why is this a cyclic group?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1,148 times
-1
-
9The set is ${1}$, not ${0, 1}$. – RghtHndSd Sep 20 '19 at 03:46
-
1Read the definition of your group again. The asterisk in $(\Bbb{Z}/n\Bbb{Z})^*$ means that only those cosets $a+n\Bbb{Z}$ are included where $\gcd(a,n)=1$. In your case $\gcd(0,2)=2$, so $0+2\Bbb{Z}$ is not an element. The trivial group is trivially cyclic – Jyrki Lahtonen Sep 20 '19 at 03:46
-
Thanks! We only just started going over cosets. So the multiplicative group of integers mod z never includes 0? – Daniel Johnston Sep 20 '19 at 03:52
-
It's the trivial group. I reckon it can be considered cyclic. – suckling pig Nov 20 '24 at 21:33
-
It is the best group imo. I prefer the ${0}$ description. – Bob Dobbs Apr 10 '25 at 04:13
-
More generally: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/373708/when-is-the-group-of-units-in-mathbbz-n-cyclic – Derek Allums Apr 10 '25 at 06:54
1 Answers
-1
The multiplicative group of a group $G$ is the collection of all those elements of the group which have a multiplicative inverse. In your case $\Bbb{Z}/2\Bbb{Z}$ does $\bar{0}$ have an element $\bar{a} \in \Bbb{Z}/2\Bbb{Z}$ such that $\bar{0a} = 1$ ?
Note that this is true for $\Bbb{Z}/n\Bbb{Z}$ for any $n$. In general you define the multiplicative group of $G$ (or the group of units, as its sometimes called) on $G-\{0\}$
Sayan Chattopadhyay
- 1,034
-
1
-
1
-
Probably worth noting that not all such groups are cyclic, since the phrasing at the end mind be confusing. – Derek Allums Apr 10 '25 at 07:02
-
The group of units does include $0$ when $n=1$. So the claim is only true for $n\ge2$. – Emil Jeřábek Apr 10 '25 at 07:14
-
1More importantly, there is not such thing as “the multiplicative group of a group $G$”. A group $G$ carries only one operation, and all elements are invertible wrt that. It only makes sense to speak of the multiplicative group of a ring $R$. And the domain of the multiplicative group in that case is not $R\smallsetminus{0}$, but ${x\in R:\exists y\in R,xy=yx=1}$, which, on the one hand, will omit elements other than $0$ if $R$ is not a field (or division ring), and on the other hand, will include $0$ if $R$ is the trivial ring. – Emil Jeřábek Apr 10 '25 at 07:20