5

I have to compute the fundamentalgroup of the projective plane $\Bbb{R}P^2$ with Van-Kampen Theorem. Therefore I use the fundamental polygon given in Projective Plane. I get for the presentation of the group:

$$\pi_1(X,x_0)=<a,b :abab=1>$$

But this isn't the presentation of $\Bbb{Z}/2\Bbb{Z}$, is it? But this havt to be the result. What is wrong?


I did it this way:

Choose the open set $U$ as the plane without a disc and $V$ as the dics a little bit larger then the discs we ommitted in $U$, thus $U\cap V$ is an annulus. Then I notice $\pi_1(V)=0$ thus trivial and $\pi_1(U\cap V)=\Bbb{Z}$. $U\cap V$ has thus one generator, suppose $g$ (run around the annulus).

An embedding in $V$ gives the empty word (null-homotopical). With an embedding in $U$ is $g$ homotopic to the loop running along the boundary of the polygon. This gives the word $abab$. Thus we get the presentation as above. Where is the mistake? I hope someone can give hints or the good solution. Thanks!

Watson
  • 24,404

1 Answers1

3

If you take a square $[0,1]\times[0,1]$ with the identification $(x,0)\sim (1-x,1)$ and $(0,y)\sim (1,1-y)$ then this identification only identifies $(0,0)$ with $(1,1)$, and $(0,1)$ only with $(1,0)$.

So the path $a$ corresponding to $t\to (t,0)$ is not a loop in the real projective plane.

Not sure what the "right" solution to this is for computing $\mathbb RP^2$.

If you take $U$ to be the image of $(0,1)\times (0,1)$ and $V$ to be the image of $T^2$ where $T=[0,\frac{1}{3})\cup(\frac{2}{3},1]$, $U$ is clearly simply connected and I think it is easy to show that $V$ is retractable to a circle - the image of $T^2$ is a Möbius strip.

These are essentially the same $U,V$ you chose, but I think picking a square $U$ makes it more obvious what $V$ is.

Thomas Andrews
  • 186,215