2

I'm proving this theorem:

Let $X,Y$ be metric spaces. Then a function $f:X \to Y$ is continuous at $x$ if and only if $f$ is sequentially continuous at $x$.

My questions:

  1. Does my proof look fine or contains logical gaps/errors? Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.

  2. Is it possible to utilize a weaker form of Axiom of Choice?

Thank you for your help!


My attempt:

"$\Longrightarrow$": Assume that $f:X \to Y$ is continuous at $x$ and that $(x_k)_{k \in \mathbb N}$ converges to $x$. For every neighborhood $V$ of $f(x)$, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f(U) \subseteq V$. On the other hand, all most all $x_k$'s are in $U$, so all most all $f(x_k)$'s are in $V$. Hence $(f(x_k))_{k \in \mathbb N}$ converges to $f(x)$ and thus $f$ is sequentially continuous at $x$.

"$\Longleftarrow$": Assume the contrary that $f$ is sequentially continuous at $\overline x$ but discontinuous at $\overline x$. Then there is a neighborhood $V$ of $f(\overline x)$ such that $f[\mathbb B(\overline x,1/k)] \not \subseteq V$ for all $k$. We define a sequence $(A_k)_{k \in \mathbb N}$ by $A_k = \{x \in \mathbb B(\overline x,1/k) \mid f(x) \notin V\}$. By assumption, $A_k \neq \emptyset$ for all $k$. By Axiom of Choice, there exists a sequence $(x_k)_{k \in \mathbb N}$ such that $x_k \in A_k$ for all $k$. By construction, $(x_k)_{k \in \mathbb N}$ converges to $\overline x$. On the other hand, $(f(x_k))_{k \in \mathbb N}$ does not converge to $f(\overline x)$ because all of $f(x_k)$'s do not belong to the neighborhood $V$ of $f(\overline x)$. This is a contradiction. As a result, if $f$ is sequentially continuous at $x$, then $f$ continuous at $x$.

Akira
  • 18,439
  • The proof seems fine to me. I would've proven it the same way: by constructing a sequence convergent to $x$ contradicting $f$ being sequentially continuous. I don't see a way without the Axiom of choice yet. – 0CT0 Sep 05 '19 at 08:54
  • 2
    The claim is equivalent to countable choice. Which is really all you need, since you're choosing from a countable family of sets. – Asaf Karagila Sep 05 '19 at 09:08
  • Related: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/346526/proof-of-a-basic-ac-omega-equivalence – Asaf Karagila Sep 05 '19 at 09:12
  • Thank you so much, I got it. – Akira Sep 05 '19 at 10:53

0 Answers0